1)What does the article (or section) do well? This article fully covers the Coronavirus’ impact on oil in every aspect. It also has supporting images to make the article more visually appealing. In addition, the hyperlinks are helpful to read more about mentioned topics. The sources are also reliable, and this seems to be a good synthesis of the presented information. The table is also helpful and visually easy to read and understand.
2) What changes would you suggest overall?'
In some places it feels like you are drawing your own conclusions, like saying “Such evidence shows that” feels more so like an argumentative paper and less so an encyclopedia article with only facts. 3)What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution?
Add more citations in the WHO Suggestions section
4)Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know!
This is pretty good work, I definitely feel that this article is visually appealing, and I want to carry that kind of nice visualization into my article. Good work!!