Welcome!

Hello, Younsmere, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or a helper Commander Keane on our talk page. Again, welcome!

Anonymous anonymous 09:13, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply



WP Bristol edit

Gasheadsteve 14:02, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rinovia Steam Fishing Company Ltd. edit

Hi Younsmere. If you have access to the relevant information, it would be good if you developed Rinovia Steam Fishing Company Ltd. more. It has the potential to be quite an interesting historical article, but it need much more fleshing out. --Geronimo20 (talk) 09:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bristol meetup edit

Hi Younsmere. I'm from Wikimedia UK - the local chapter representing Wikimedia here in Britain. Just wanted to let you know that we are hosting a conference in Bristol this weekend - more details here. We want to organise a meetup - WP:Meetup/Bristol_1 - where local Wikipedians can meet representatives of the UK chapter, the Wikimedia Foundation and other chapters around the world as well as other local people interested in Wikipedia. Please let me know if you're interested in coming along! AndrewRT(Talk) 23:41, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference edit

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Brenda Fisher edit

Your red-link to Fisher in Grimsby was rightly removed. I have now added Fisher back with a new article for her. Acabashi (talk) 18:34, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bewys Cross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Avon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:36, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Avonmouth Light Railway has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Avonmouth Light Railway. Thanks! heyzec! 05:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please divide Draft:Avonmouth Light Railway into sections edit

Please see WP:Sections for how to divide it, and it will create the Table of Contents for you, you needn't type it manually. Please fix for tidiness while awaiting review. MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Avonmouth Light Railway has been accepted edit

 
Avonmouth Light Railway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~~JHUbal27 02:34, 3 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 13 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Soar y mynydd
added links pointing to Lot, Sodom, Gomorrah, Genesis, Revivalist and Henry Richards

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Younsmere. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Younsmere. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 29 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monmouth Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Devon Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 29 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Younsmere. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Goram and Vincent edit

Thank you for the excellent Goram and Vincent article! I saw a discussion on the talk page questioning the early sources that you'd found, and started to look into it, but had a few questions:

  • You mentioned that the story was found in Camden's Britannia, but the only mention I could find was his description of St. Vincent's Rock, but not the story associated with it.
  • You also mentioned a poem by Chatterton, based on Camden's version, citing Bristol Archives Harford 28048. This is a vast collection, and the catalogue doesn't seem to record any mentions of Chatterton, Vincent, Goram, Ghyston, etc. within it. Is there any chance you remember which sub-item contains/mentions the poem? And was it a published poem, or unpublished? I can't find mentions of Vincent, Goram, Ghyston, etc. in the collected works of Chatterton/Rowley.

The third early source you mention (Atkyns' history of Gloucestershire) does contain the story, so I've added this (and William Worcester's mention of the Giant Ghyst) to the article, but without definite sources for Camden and Chatterton, these might have to be removed, which would be a great shame! Any help you can give would be much appreciated. --YodinT 12:20, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply