Constructive edits, edit

You've been told two times now by experienced editors that it was not. I suggest you drop it.— dαlus Contribs 05:53, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

You're wrong though.—Preceding unsigned comment added by YoshiHiroshi (talkcontribs)
I'm not the one currently blocked for vandalism.— dαlus Contribs 06:01, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010 edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — dαlus Contribs 05:54, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GorillaWarfare talk 06:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Actually, I've blocked this account indefinitely. Your extremely racist and offensive edit summaries show you are not here to edit in a constructive manner. You can appeal this block as described above. AniMate 06:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply