YassinRi

Hello, I'm IronManCap. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. IronManCap (talk) 23:06, 17 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2024 edit

Latest comment: 3 days ago6 comments4 people in discussion

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Safi, Morocco. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Skitash (talk) 17:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 18:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YassinRi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to appeal the block on my account mistakenly identified as a sockpuppet of Yassine181 i assure you i have no connection with this user and my contributions always referenced or translated from another language of wikipedia of the same article and reflect my commitment to the community's standards please review my case and consider reinstating my account i am ready to comply with any required verification processes. YassinRi (talk) 19:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

The coincidences seem too great for a simple denial to be sufficient here. Even if there's no relation, there's been significant problems with your editing. Yamla (talk) 19:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

YassinRi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to address the concerns regarding my Wikipedia account being potentially linked to another account, "Yassine181." I understand the severity of the accusations and appreciate the need for maintaining the integrity of the Wikipedia community. However, after a detailed review of both accounts' activities, significant differences underscore that these accounts are operated by different individuals:

Focus and Content of Edits:

"Yassine181": Primarily engages in highly contentious editing regarding political and ethnic identity issues within the Maghreb region. The edits are often emotionally charged and involve substantial reverts and deletions, reflecting a particular stance on the Arab-Berber identity conflict.
"YassinRi": Focuses on well-sourced contributions and translations relating to local Moroccan geography and culture, such as the updates on Safi, Morocco, and contributions to articles about local historical figures and sites. These contributions are informational and intended to enrich the content with verifiable sources and translations from French Wikipedia.

Editing Style and Behavior:

"Yassine181": Has been involved in edit wars, as evident from consecutive reverts and emotionally driven content in edit summaries, suggesting a personal or emotional investment in the topics.
"YassinRi": Consistently adds sourced information and engages in constructive edits. Even when mistakes were made in the past, recent edits have been responsible and aimed at improving article quality.

Account Age and History:

My account, "YassinRi," is older than "Yassine181," which is relevant not only in terms of longevity but also the evolution of editing behavior over time, showing a learning curve and adaptation to Wikipedia’s standards.

Admission of Past Errors:

I acknowledge that earlier in my editing history, I may have made errors, but I have taken conscientious steps to ensure all my recent contributions are constructive, sourced, and align with community guidelines.

In light of the above points, the evidence strongly indicates that these accounts are operated independently, with distinct focuses, styles, and behaviors. My contributions have been made in good faith, with a clear record of improvement and adherence to Wikipedia's editing standards.

I kindly request a re-evaluation of the block in consideration of these clarifications. I am committed to transparency and am willing to engage in any verification process required to confirm my identity as distinct from "Yassine181."

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am writing to address the concerns regarding my Wikipedia account being potentially linked to another account, "Yassine181." I understand the severity of the accusations and appreciate the need for maintaining the integrity of the Wikipedia community. However, after a detailed review of both accounts' activities, significant differences underscore that these accounts are operated by different individuals:

;'''Focus and Content of Edits:'''
:* '''"Yassine181"''': Primarily engages in highly contentious editing regarding political and ethnic identity issues within the Maghreb region. The edits are often emotionally charged and involve substantial reverts and deletions, reflecting a particular stance on the Arab-Berber identity conflict.
:* '''"YassinRi"''': Focuses on well-sourced contributions and translations relating to local Moroccan geography and culture, such as the updates on Safi, Morocco, and contributions to articles about local historical figures and sites. These contributions are informational and intended to enrich the content with verifiable sources and translations from French Wikipedia.

;'''Editing Style and Behavior:'''
:* '''"Yassine181"''': Has been involved in edit wars, as evident from consecutive reverts and emotionally driven content in edit summaries, suggesting a personal or emotional investment in the topics.
:* '''"YassinRi"''': Consistently adds sourced information and engages in constructive edits. Even when mistakes were made in the past, recent edits have been responsible and aimed at improving article quality.

;'''Account Age and History:'''
:* My account, "YassinRi," is older than "Yassine181," which is relevant not only in terms of longevity but also the evolution of editing behavior over time, showing a learning curve and adaptation to Wikipedia’s standards.

;'''Admission of Past Errors:'''
:* I acknowledge that earlier in my editing history, I may have made errors, but I have taken conscientious steps to ensure all my recent contributions are constructive, sourced, and align with community guidelines.

In light of the above points, the evidence strongly indicates that these accounts are operated independently, with distinct focuses, styles, and behaviors. My contributions have been made in good faith, with a clear record of improvement and adherence to Wikipedia's editing standards.

I kindly request a re-evaluation of the block in consideration of these clarifications. I am committed to transparency and am willing to engage in any verification process required to confirm my identity as distinct from "Yassine181."

Thank you for your attention to this matter. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am writing to address the concerns regarding my Wikipedia account being potentially linked to another account, "Yassine181." I understand the severity of the accusations and appreciate the need for maintaining the integrity of the Wikipedia community. However, after a detailed review of both accounts' activities, significant differences underscore that these accounts are operated by different individuals:

;'''Focus and Content of Edits:'''
:* '''"Yassine181"''': Primarily engages in highly contentious editing regarding political and ethnic identity issues within the Maghreb region. The edits are often emotionally charged and involve substantial reverts and deletions, reflecting a particular stance on the Arab-Berber identity conflict.
:* '''"YassinRi"''': Focuses on well-sourced contributions and translations relating to local Moroccan geography and culture, such as the updates on Safi, Morocco, and contributions to articles about local historical figures and sites. These contributions are informational and intended to enrich the content with verifiable sources and translations from French Wikipedia.

;'''Editing Style and Behavior:'''
:* '''"Yassine181"''': Has been involved in edit wars, as evident from consecutive reverts and emotionally driven content in edit summaries, suggesting a personal or emotional investment in the topics.
:* '''"YassinRi"''': Consistently adds sourced information and engages in constructive edits. Even when mistakes were made in the past, recent edits have been responsible and aimed at improving article quality.

;'''Account Age and History:'''
:* My account, "YassinRi," is older than "Yassine181," which is relevant not only in terms of longevity but also the evolution of editing behavior over time, showing a learning curve and adaptation to Wikipedia’s standards.

;'''Admission of Past Errors:'''
:* I acknowledge that earlier in my editing history, I may have made errors, but I have taken conscientious steps to ensure all my recent contributions are constructive, sourced, and align with community guidelines.

In light of the above points, the evidence strongly indicates that these accounts are operated independently, with distinct focuses, styles, and behaviors. My contributions have been made in good faith, with a clear record of improvement and adherence to Wikipedia's editing standards.

I kindly request a re-evaluation of the block in consideration of these clarifications. I am committed to transparency and am willing to engage in any verification process required to confirm my identity as distinct from "Yassine181."

Thank you for your attention to this matter. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am writing to address the concerns regarding my Wikipedia account being potentially linked to another account, "Yassine181." I understand the severity of the accusations and appreciate the need for maintaining the integrity of the Wikipedia community. However, after a detailed review of both accounts' activities, significant differences underscore that these accounts are operated by different individuals:

;'''Focus and Content of Edits:'''
:* '''"Yassine181"''': Primarily engages in highly contentious editing regarding political and ethnic identity issues within the Maghreb region. The edits are often emotionally charged and involve substantial reverts and deletions, reflecting a particular stance on the Arab-Berber identity conflict.
:* '''"YassinRi"''': Focuses on well-sourced contributions and translations relating to local Moroccan geography and culture, such as the updates on Safi, Morocco, and contributions to articles about local historical figures and sites. These contributions are informational and intended to enrich the content with verifiable sources and translations from French Wikipedia.

;'''Editing Style and Behavior:'''
:* '''"Yassine181"''': Has been involved in edit wars, as evident from consecutive reverts and emotionally driven content in edit summaries, suggesting a personal or emotional investment in the topics.
:* '''"YassinRi"''': Consistently adds sourced information and engages in constructive edits. Even when mistakes were made in the past, recent edits have been responsible and aimed at improving article quality.

;'''Account Age and History:'''
:* My account, "YassinRi," is older than "Yassine181," which is relevant not only in terms of longevity but also the evolution of editing behavior over time, showing a learning curve and adaptation to Wikipedia’s standards.

;'''Admission of Past Errors:'''
:* I acknowledge that earlier in my editing history, I may have made errors, but I have taken conscientious steps to ensure all my recent contributions are constructive, sourced, and align with community guidelines.

In light of the above points, the evidence strongly indicates that these accounts are operated independently, with distinct focuses, styles, and behaviors. My contributions have been made in good faith, with a clear record of improvement and adherence to Wikipedia's editing standards.

I kindly request a re-evaluation of the block in consideration of these clarifications. I am committed to transparency and am willing to engage in any verification process required to confirm my identity as distinct from "Yassine181."

Thank you for your attention to this matter. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Note from blocking admin: See the intertwined contribution history of these two accounts. While YassinRi' does seem less provocative and confrontational than Yassine181, I would differ with him on how his editing "show[s] a learning curve and adaptation to Wikipedia's standards", since after making a few edits shortly following the account's creation three years ago, YassinRi made no edits whatsoever until after Yassine181 was blocked indefinitely. It could just as easily be inferred that the editor decided to create the second account to right a great wrong, in the hope that if that didn't work out they could go back to using the original account without anyone being the wiser. Sometimes that has worked; I don't think this is one of those times.

Now, if YassinRi were to admit they created and edited with both accounts, I might be amenable to letting them continue to edit with this' one (and only this one) as long as they disclosed it on their userpage (as well as any other accounts they may have created even if they were never used) and were willing to edit in conformity with Wikipedia policies from then on. (I would also like to hear what @Skitash: thinks, since it was their AIV report that led to this block). Daniel Case (talk) 17:34, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reply to the note of the blocking admin @Daniel Case:: Thank you for addressing my previous message. I must clarify, I only operate this one Wikipedia account which is YassinRi. The differences between my contributions and those of "Yassine181" are clear: I focus on diversified topics with well-sourced information or translations, contrasting sharply with the single-issue, often biased edits from "Yassine181."

I value honesty and integrity above all, and while I deeply appreciate the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia, I cannot admit to actions that are not true, even if it would mean regaining my editing privileges. If my account remains blocked under these circumstances, I accept this outcome, as I stand by the truth and the principles that define this community.

I completely agree with you. I find it peculiar that this user has seemingly come back to editing shortly after Yassine181 had been blocked indefinitely. Could it be that YassinRi created Yassine181 as a single purpose account to pursue certain controversial tasks through disruptive means? The actions of both accounts bear a striking resemblance, particularly in their evident ethnic POV and tendency to add unsourced WP:OR to articles pertaining to Morocco, as evidenced by YassinRi's undiscussed page move and persistent addition of unsourced content.[1][2][3][4] I'm open to the idea of unblocking the user provided they disclosed their sockpuppets, set aside their POV and refrained from adding unsourced content. Skitash (talk) 20:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic