User talk:Yashthepunisher/Archive 1

October 2014

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Vikram Bhatt, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 14:04, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anurag Kashyap may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• case|Sanjeev Nanda BMW hit-and-run case]] and [[DPS MMS Scandal|MMS scandal]] in [[Dev.D]]'' (2009)) and portrayal of real life gang wars that took place in the region of [[Dhanbad]]'',[[Jharkhand]]''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anurag kashyap filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kaun. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anurag Kashyap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anurag Kashyap

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anurag Kashyap you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kailash29792 -- Kailash29792 (talk) 15:01, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Anurag Kashyap filmography

Thanks for the offer, but I will only get back to major editing by June 2015 as per my talk page. So, I have to decline this one. Sorry. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Based on the oppose votes at the FLC nomination, I'm suggesting that you should withdraw the nom and work on it. I myself had to do this with Akshay Kumar filmography. This is not what you wanted to hear but based on present circumstances there is no chance that this will be passed in the first attempt. Regards, --Skr15081997 (talk) 16:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

I second Skr15081997's advice. -- FrankBoy _CHITCHAT 20:58, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Bollywood

Since the article about Hindi cinema currently sits at Bollywood, I see no reason for justification of your edits. —Vensatry _(ping) 13:54, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes, please stop and gain consensus. It seems to me that Bollywood is no more regressive than Hollywood. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:00, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Anurag Kashyap filmography/archive1, you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:59, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anurag Kashyap

The article Anurag Kashyap you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anurag Kashyap for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kailash29792 -- Kailash29792 (talk) 07:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For bringing the article Anurag Kashyap to GA status with a great level of patience and hardwork. Keep it up! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, congratulations Yash on your first GA. You can create your userpage and use it as a gallery of your achievements and awards received. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you both of you. Sure I will. Yashthepunisher (talk) 5:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

PR

Next time when you open something for a peer review, do remember to do this task, and don't worry it'll be an FL. -- FrankBoy _CHITCHAT 17:09, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't knew that. Its my first time, so please help in withdrawing the nom. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

I was talking about the peer review, and not withdrawing. Whenever you list an article for peer review, do this in the talk page. Anyways you do not need to do anything else for withdrawing. Just wait and the featured list director or a delegate will close it. Now you have to do is wait for the reviewers' comments at peer, and later renominate it for the FLC. Hopefully it will be soon an FL. I have posted comments at the peer review. -- FrankBoy _CHITCHAT 20:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for clarifying, but i'm not against your edits, I am just clarifying that the removal contents are really unnecessary, so i just asked to someone. Hetika (talk) 16:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Her school is still mentioned: "Mehta was educated at the Carmel Convent School"... Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

but not "Sacred Heart Convent school". Hetika (talk) 17:02, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

I have mentioned it, are you happy now? Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:06, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Not happy, actually i am soooo happy with you for making it for GA class. So Thanks. Hetika (talk) 17:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Anytime Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Anurag Kashyap filmography

If you're still not sure on the styling of the list, please visit one of the pages from this, and get inspired. WP:FILMOGRAPHY might also help you. -- FrankBoy _CHITCHAT 14:53, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

There are still some problems:-

• I am unable to swipe the places of year and title, If you could show me by doing it to any one film of the feature film and short film section, I'll do the rest.
• Can you also do the scope row thing to the short film section? Again I'm unable to do that as well.
• Are there any other Issues in this list? Please let me know, coz after its finished, I will renominate it for FLC. -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

• I have done everything (the whole). Now you have to do is check if all comments in the pr are resolved. Check for the errors personally and fix them. See ya at the FLC. -- FrankBoy _CHITCHAT 15:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Ok and thanks for the edits. -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:13, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anushka Sharma

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anushka Sharma you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 06:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

I can help you in fixing those redirects. Willing to spare a moment? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Sure, and thanks for the help. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for being late. Well, the best way to fix those references, is to archive them. Because, though you can simply click on the url and copy-paste the new one in the place of the existing one to solve this problem, there is a risk of link-rotting. So now you can archive them using this for archiving those links and in those references add |archiveurl=the url you are shown as a result of "saving"|archivedate=the date on which you archived the link}}</ref> If the link i gave does not work for few of them, you can use this one. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:46, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Pavan, I will try. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

I've been a major contributor to the Sharma article for the past year or so. It's a shame that you nominated it for GA after making some changes without even consulting me. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 07:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Krimuk, in retaliation, you may make even bigger changes than what Yash has done now, and nominate it for FAC. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:56, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

It's not about retaliation, and I am not here to be a hysterical diva. I'm just making an observation on how I am not involved in the GA process of an article that I helped expand for several months. I only wish he was kind enough to notify me. That's all. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 07:59, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

@Krimuk90: I have tried asking you for help in the past, but you don't respond. I am not ashamed of taking it to GA, and I'm not doing this for taking credits. You make please check the article history and see my contribution. Its not personal and Kailash is right, you can take it to FA status. I just thought when most of her contemporaries are either GA or FA, why leave her..! --Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Please think before you say something as ridiculous as "its a shame you nominated it without asking me"...well you are not the owner of the article and neither am I, so I don't need your approval for doing anything. "some changes", What does that means??? Check If the "Personal life and off-screen work" and "In the media" section existed before my edit. If you care so much, Why its not a GA already? You can edit and do whatever you want to do with now and take the credit coz I'm done with it. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

It's that sucky know-it-all attitude of yours that's disgusting. You are new here; learn from the more experienced editors and don't throw your weight around. It's people like you who make editing on Wikipedia a tiresome experience. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 02:26, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Spending more time here than me doesn't gives you a right to say anything. Its all about credits, well I helped taking Vivah to GA as a unregistered user; but I don't take credit for that. Its very sweet of you to interrupt in between a on-going review. You started It all, I didn't. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

That's too rude guys. Both of you. Instead of collaborating for something productive, you both have picked up a row. Hope you leave this here itself. Wikipedia cannot afford another cockfight! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:58, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

GA article

Fine. I'll do that. I am a girl, by the way.Semanti 07:21, 2 July 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semanti Paul (talk • contribs)

I didn't knew that. You can continue it after it becomes a Good Article, which it will become soon.-Yashthepunisher (talk) 7:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anushka Sharma

The article Anushka Sharma you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Anushka Sharma for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 09:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Give it a copyedit. This time by another editor. You can ask User:Jaguar, who has performed a c. e. on Mayabazar, to do it. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 11:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

3 July 2015

Why cant you take it anymore? For God sake can you tell me what's going on with you? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:52, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yashthepunisher, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

--Krimuk|90 (talk) 14:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for sock puppetry. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 18:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anushka Sharma

The article Anushka Sharma you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Anushka Sharma for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 04:41, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Help!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yashthepunisher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. I have never vandalized any article or abused anyone, and I want to continue my contributions to wikipedia. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

There is nothing we can do about a block on an IP address unless you tell us what IP address it is that is blocked. Please make another unblock request, but this time tell us what IP address it is. The notice telling you that you can't edit will include that information. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblocked

Your block was only for a week. You are already unblocked. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Unblock me

JamesBWatson

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Yashthepunisher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

my IP address is 118.102.147.114. It has been blocked.

Accept reason:

You should be okay now. Bbb23 (talk) 04:44, 28 August 2015 (UTC)