Child Molester edit

Xizer likes to touch little boys. He's been banned from most forums for this. I see wikipedia loves child porn! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.223.214.78 (talk) 14:37, 23 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Page wiped edit

stupid wikipedia neckbeard-programmed bot shit I don't have time for Xizer (talk) 22:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

January 2008 edit

First off, may I suggest you review Wikipedia's policies concerning conduct, I think you'll find that your recent edit summary is not in keeping with them. Second off, yes, you're correct that users are more than welcome to delete their talk pages if they so wish but, given the fact that talk pages are a useful way for all users (including you) to communicate, you may find it more appropriate to archive yours. RaseaC (talk) 22:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Users are not stupid bots that go around trolling images on Wikipedia. I don't care about that crap. As for archiving, that's what the nice little history tab at the top of this talk page is for.

If an actual user ever needs to communicate with me, I will see their post on this talk page. I only wiped it due to botspam. Xizer (talk) 22:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

THanks for your reply. How delightful to have communicated with you. It's obvious that you need more help than Wikipedia's policies can deliver. Good luck with that. RaseaC (talk) 22:38, 8 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

2 1/2 edit

Hi Xizer,

I'm just wondering whether this edit had anything to do with Steve Colbert's appeal? :-) Since going from 8000 to 20,000 is a factor of 2 1/2, not quite 3, "tripled" doesn't seem quite right. Just checking...

Joriki (talk) 12:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Upper Peninsula War edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Upper Peninsula War, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.dtownie.com/2007/06/07/the-upper-peninsula-war. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply


 

A tag has been placed on Upper Peninsula War, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Upper Peninsula War is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Upper Peninsula War saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Artichoker[talk] 14:19, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

August 2008 edit

Hi there - you keep inserting the statement that Obama is a grammy award-winning presidential candidate. As true as that is, it does not belong in the lead of his biography article. Please take the cue that people are removing it. That's got plenty of mention elsewhere in the encyclopedia, for example in the "Dreams from My Father" section in the middle of the article. Please don't insert it again into the lead - take a look at the "article probation" notice on the talk page, and also the policy WP:3RR for some explanations of why not to keep reverting things. You may be temporarily blocked from further editing the encyclopedia if you do. Thanks, Wikidemo (talk) 09:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Húsönd 16:24, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Three revert rule edit

 
Warning

I think there is something I will have to explain to you. You are the one who reverts peoples edits and removes referenced and absolutely legitimate materials;not once, not twice but many times.You were even blocked for violating three revert rule by Husond. From someone who is engaged in that kind of violations and many other controversial edits - as one can see on your talk page - I think it is time for you to stop posting this spam like messages on every talk page and look at your own edit history. What you are doing is wrong. Stop warning innocent people against violating three revert rule when you were blocked for the very same violation just recently.[1]--Satt 2 (talk) 14:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, you have been blocked for violating WP:3RR again shortly after your last block. When the current block expires, please refrain from edit warring, and engage in constructive discussions on the talk pages instead of attempting to enforce unilateral edits. Thank you. Húsönd 01:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

WiiConnect24 edit

Please stop your edits to WiiConnect24. They are now becoming vandalism. Not only has this issue been proven not to be true, but you're trying to cite the false issue with a completely unacceptable source. -Zomic13 (talk) 21:17, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

What the hell are you talking about? That is a terrible analogy. -Zomic13 (talk) 04:26, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
I wasn't aware that Nintendo had even commented on the issue. -Zomic13 (talk) 04:47, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008 edit

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. The episode guides you restored to List of LazyTown episodes are all copied from an external source and do not meet non-free content guidelines. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Mk3 motaro.png) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Mk3 motaro.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 30 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Glenn Beck. edit

You've been here five years, and cannot figure out a hoax, nor read the talk page for the fact that it is a hoax? Come on. ThuranX (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

November 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Reconsider the static (talk) 08:48, 26 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Xizer, this edit summary is unacceptable. Given your extensive block history, one would hope that you would tread cautiously, rather than ignoring past warnings and incidents. If there is another incident like this, you will in all likelihood lose your editing privileges for an extended period. --Ckatzchatspy 17:18, 26 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Alright, I will refrain from swearing at other editors in my future edits. Xizer (talk) 20:38, 26 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just checking edit

Are there any references to Billo the clown being Bill O'Reilly (political commentator)? Otherwise I'm inclined to speedily delete it. -- Flyguy649 talk 03:56, 26 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Apparently there are. Nevermind. -- Flyguy649 talk 03:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of GooTube edit

I have nominated GooTube (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 15:26, 25 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

DERP DERP edit

Ya still like Lazy Town?:smug:--Ace Oliveira (talk) 01:26, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

2010 Discovery hostage situation Afd edit

Be honest, did you mean this as a joke or were you serious? Superchrome (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Windows Phone 7 edit

Your edits to this article reflect the product in an overly negative light. The article should not be a list of missing features; it should be an encyclopedic description. There is a place for mention of missing features - critical reaction to these should, where appropriate, be placed in the Reception section. Also, the older version of the article, before you reverted many recent changes, was much more lucid and grammatically correct. CalumCookable (talk) 11:53, 6 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Chobin listed at Redirects for discussion edit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chobin. Since you had some involvement with the Chobin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Fleet Command (talk) 06:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Vanguard Editor, really? edit

May I remind you that the requirements for displaying that star are 200,000 edits and 20 years' service. While it seems that you have made a total of 1,218 edits during your time here at Wikipedia. I would ask that you replace the Vanguard Editor star with the one that you are entitled to display: The Apprentice Editor. Fly by Night (talk) 23:47, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Fringe Season 3 Blu-ray.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Fringe Season 3 Blu-ray.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:57, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Fringe Season 3 Blu-ray.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Fringe Season 3 Blu-ray.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:14, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll edit

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011 edit

 

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on William Adams (judge). Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 02:29, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you.--Kansas Bear (talk) 02:37, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

ANI notice edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 02:37, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Bushranger One ping only 02:57, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

I have blocked you 48 hours for the flagrant incivility in this edit summary. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:05, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll edit

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 24 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of most expensive video games to develop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:How the Universe Works.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:How the Universe Works.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Edits to Sleeping Dogs edit

Hello, I see your edits to Sleeping Dogs don't appear to be constructive. You removed a large selection of text seemingly only because you disagreed with it despite it being properly referenced. Please open a discussion on the talk page if you'd like it removed. Additionally, please see Help:Minor edit for the use of the Minor edit feature. Removing large sections of content from a page is not covered. --WhereAmI (talk) 20:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Xizer: I see you keep removing the text despite 3 users (including myself) on the talk page deciding it should stay. If you remove it again I will have to report you for Three-revert rule, something I've seen you have been warned about in the past. --WhereAmI (talk) 21:31, 9 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dance Central Spotlight, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Drake and Take Care. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015 edit

 

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:21, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Moving Burma to Myanmar - new 2015 poll edit

You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:13, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of K9.5: The Tail-Wag Tour for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K9.5: The Tail-Wag Tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K9.5: The Tail-Wag Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 03:10, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Calamity Adventure 2: People and Traditions for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Calamity Adventure 2: People and Traditions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calamity Adventure 2: People and Traditions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 16:17, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Fairytales.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Fairytales.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply