User talk:Woggly/archive 4

Archives:

• User talk:Woggly/archive_1
• User talk:Woggly/archive_2
• User talk:Woggly/archive_3

user page

I added a {{clear}} tag to your user page to correct its presentation. Jon513 23:01, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I suppose. Not that I really understand what you did or what difference it makes... but now that you left the note, I can find out! --woggly 07:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Reminder...

When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.

This is regarding User:Coolstuff92 (soon to be moved to User talk:Coolstuff92. Also, may I suggest placing warnings on talk pages? — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 02:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

huh. okay. As for placement of the warning, that was of course a goof, I suppose him not having any text on his user page I didn't notice I was not in the right place. --woggly 07:30, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Admin noticeboard

Hello there. I wonder if you could please be a little more careful when editing. I'm not sure what happened here, whether an edit conflict (unlikely), a bug or something else, but the effect of posting your comment to the noticeboard was somehow to delete mine. Could you have been editing an earlier version of the page perhaps? All best wishes --Cedders^tk 22:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

• No problem. It's easy to make mistakes! (This is what "show changes" is there for.) --Cedders^tk 09:36, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Take care

Nice talking to you. Take care. Deror 17:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppet tags

Please, until the user is blocked, don't tag users pages as sockpuppets. (Even if it's obvious that its a sock). DGX 19:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Ok, as long as it's the suspect tag. I just didn't want users that weren't blocked to have the blocked message on thier page. Go ahead.. DGX 19:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

I said don't tag them until they were blocked as sockpuppets; I never said you couldn't tag them with the other tag. In any case, I reverted. DGX 19:12, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

It's alright, no problems. I'm used to people being snippy, so I didn't really give it a second glance. ;-) DGX 19:21, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

User:Col. Hauler

You might want to take a look at his previous userid. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 05:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

• And the previous one, User:Jack Hates Jesus --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 05:17, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • This edit], from Hauler's first day; and the talk page for the long name mentions the one before it. You really leaving? I probably will too if this place continues in it's pre-adolescent toxicity. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 13:59, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Farewell

Hey, good luck for the future. --BillC 10:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Sigh. What he said. I hope we'll see you around again someday. Rebecca 09:27, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Sheesh! Here I want to thank you for the excellent merge of the Rachel the Poet page, and discover you're leaving? left? Why does everyone else know this? Is there some Wikipedia:Users Leaving page I don't know about? Ð’ɴ^talk 15:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Sorry to hear about what's happened to you that caused the departure, but good luck in whatever you do in future. - Mailer Diablo 01:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Bar-Ilan vandal

Please look at my update at the page about him and at my request at your talk page at the Hebrew Wikipedia. Troll Refaim 16:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Someone from the IP has requested unblocking as "the troll was captured". --Sam Blanning^(talk) 12:53, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

SSP

Hello. The case, Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Israelbeach, which I created a RFCU for, Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Israelbeach, was closed with "declined" for some unknown reason. (I have asked why.) Anyway, I have had to close the SSP case for Israelbeach, unfortunately. Shame, really. Iolakana|^(talk) 19:42, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Burning Spear pages

I'm adding content to these new pages as we speak. check the other new pages on the Burning SPea discography that I've created —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiorted (talk • contribs)

Joel Leyden article deletion review

Thanks for asking about the political implications of the Joel Leyden deletion review. On the face of it, the out-of-process deletions of both the Joel Leyden and Israel News Agency articles inherently has the whiff of politics, magnifying the suspect nature of the unilateral deletions. Moreover, Leyden and the INA are notable precisely because they provide extensive coverage of politically charged news. The deletions are also questionable because, collectively, the Wiki seems too willing and eager to stifle criticism from the likes of the INA, rather than recognizing the potential benefits that flow from critical assessments of the Wiki from noteworthy sources, criticism that itself becomes more noteworthy with the increasing clout with whic the Wiki is possessed. Ombudsman 03:18, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Your note on AN/I

Don't let him/them get to you. It needs to be sorted out, and it will. I've left a note for Jredmond. We'll see what he can do, and we'll take it from there. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 14:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Missing you

Hi Woggly! I had a look at your page today for the first time in quite a while, only to find that it wasn't there. I was sad to see that you've apparently gone. As I remember, you were one of those who voted for me in the sysop poll back in July 2004, which was when I first met you. I do hope life is treating you kindly. David Cannon 11:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to User talk:205.188.116.201

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --AOL account 14:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Ok, you're a sysops with only a handful of recent edits, and no user page, and the user actually is blocked, my mistake, I sort of assumed that you were a newly registered user playing with block templates. It never occurred to me to check the user rights log first--AOL account 15:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

The fact that someone had also made some odd changes to template:IndefblockedIP also made the matter slightly more confusing since it looked like the template had been copy/pasted rather than subt'd onto the talk--AOL account 15:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes, sorry about that, again, I didn't look closely enough and assumed you were a new user playing with templates, in the future I'll try to avoid doing that--AOL account 17:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello again!

Well, it's great to see that you're still around after all! I'm really sorry to hear that you've been getting a rough time. I know, the behaviour of a few individuals can take all the fun out of what should be a fulfilling pastime, and sometimes it threatens to turn a dream into a nightmare. Sometimes it is good to step back for a while to recover. Anyway, I'm so glad to know that you haven't quit the project. Your user page reappeared today - and I must say I appreciated all those photos you've contributed. Have a great day. David Cannon 00:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Seconded. I know you don't know me, but I can rest assured that I, as well as many others, are here for you if you ever need to talk to someone privately. Hope you had a nice break. --Pilotguy ^{(roger that)} 23:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Thirded. The account in question is blocked now, and all other accounts that appear to be him/them will be blocked too. Don't let them drive you away. You're needed here. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 23:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Editing Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Israelbeach/publicwatchlist

Hi. I was clicking the "random article" button and I ran across this. It shouldn't be in the article space and I'm assumign the "editing" prefix was a typo... can you move it to Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Israelbeach/publicwatchlist or allow me to move it there? I didn't want to do it before discussing it with you... but, does that sound good? gren グレン 23:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Obcession with Israelbeach

Do not understand the obcession that a few have with Israelbeach. Is there any evidence of abuse by Israelbeach? Has anyone performed a checkuser. If one has a clear arguement for being unfairly attacked and not being allowed to respond it would be Israelbeach. This is censorship and harassment of a user who is no longer here but one who was honest engough to ID'd himself. Let it be. There have been enough Google News stories on this subject. Maayanbaruch 18:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

The bad spelling is one of your trademarks, Joel. Obsession. Get a dictionary. --woggly 18:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)