Wikicluck44

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jan Poolman (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jan Poolman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Wikicluck44! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jan Poolman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jan Poolman. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jan Poolman (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jan Poolman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   16:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jan Poolman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jan Poolman. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Referencing on Jan Poolman article

As I noted in a review of your Draft:Jan Poolman, one of the problem is trying to see what the refs actually say. I have structured three of the references into standard Wikipedia standard referencing format. It would be very helpful if you could complete that task. However, from what little I have seen in the work that I have done, there is very little point in using academic literature as a source if all it does is demonstrate that the subject is an academic - we know that already. For most notable people 4 or 5 good refs will do with additional ones to support potentially contentious items. Acadamic papers, especially when they have more than one author, very rarely perform that function. Regards  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   16:35, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Dear Velella, first of all thanks for your review. I will work on your comments and make the references according to the standard referencing format. Your first comment was that I should show that Poolman is head of bacterial vaccines... and that the 2 references 1 and 2 were not about his function. That I agree with, the references were on the bacterial pathogens E. coli and S. aureus. And when I add linkedin as a source, I get the remark from theroadislong that linkedin and blogs are not accepted as links... Do I need to prove that Poolman is head of bacterial vaccines?

I am new at this field - If I work on it in the current settings and I save my changes with ctrl-enter, it is not being resubmitted isn't it - Or do I have to take it back to my 'sandbox' and work on it there before adjusting my article here?

I will work on a new version, because to my honest opinion this Dutch scientist Poolman is worth a wikipedia page, mainly because he has contributed with his R&D team to eight bacterial vaccines during his period as head of Bacterial Vaccines of GSK, And those vaccines are implemented in most of the national immunization programs and still in use, saving lives every day.

I will check language and references for other scientists with a wikipage and see what is approved and what not.

Once again, I thank you for your review and will resubmit when I am done adjusting the wikipedia page.

best Wikicluck44 (talk) 17:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jan Poolman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jan Poolman. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jan Poolman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jan Poolman. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)