Wiki123qws, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure! edit

The
Adventure
 

Hi Wiki123qws!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 18:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Sicktapez Vol 1: Mor Fein(album) edit

Hello Wiki123qws,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sicktapez Vol 1: Mor Fein(album) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tco03displays (talk) 19:48, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Orleans Technical Institute edit

 

The article Orleans Technical Institute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable non-public school

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:06, 10 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Frederick Miller may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Infobox person

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Karl Elsener (inventor) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • it if lost. He named his new company after his wife, Victoria, which is the Latin word for "steel"). <ref>[http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/serafina/2013/05/1283945-prestes-a-fazer-130-anos-canivete-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:29, 19 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Hans Riegel, Sr. edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hans Riegel, Sr. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 04:48, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Kim Young the son.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Kim Young the son.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:25, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

White Jesus: Revival edit

Hello Wiki123qws,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, White Jesus: Revival, may be copied from http://www.livemixtapes.com/mixtapes/16712/rittz_white_jesus_revival.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 00:41, 14 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced additions edit

I have reverted your edit to Rich Cronin wherein you mention that he is buried in Sparta, NJ. There is no evidence in the given citations to support that statement. Adding unsourced material is generally frowned upon. Adding unsourced material and citing it with false sources can only be considered vandalism. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:13, 19 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of TJ Palmer edit

 

The article TJ Palmer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 69.181.253.230 (talk) 00:21, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 20 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Supernova (Mr Hudson song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electronic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of NuBeginnings edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NuBeginnings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Finealt (talk) 01:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lose Cannons (rap duet) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lose Cannons (rap duet) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Flat Out let's discuss it 01:18, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jann Simon Wenner.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Jann Simon Wenner.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 20:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Adoption edit

Dear Wiki123qws,

I have noted that your contributions to Wikipedia have been almost universally reversed. Articles you have created and files you have uploaded have been deleted for various reasons. Edits you have made to various articles have been reverted. In general, your submissions do not appear to be vandalism, but rather a misunderstanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines, even though these have been pointed out to you in numerous messages on this talk page.

If you continue along this path, you may well find yourself blocked for disruptive editing. Rather than continuing to head in that direction, I suggest that you seek adoption. A more experienced editor can take you under their wing and help you become a better Wikipedia editor. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:07, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013 edit

Speedy deletion nomination of Flynn Earl Jones edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Flynn Earl Jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. MarnetteD | Talk 22:18, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • I would suggest you take WikiDan61 up on the offer of mentorship if you wish to become a productive editor. MarnetteD | Talk 22:18, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • To clarify, I was not actually offering to be the mentor; I do not have the time or bandwidth for such an endeavor. But there are many volunteers in the WP:Adopt-a-user program who would gladly take Wiki123qws under their wing. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:09, 25 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 22:30, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Do not upload images of people you've found on the Internet. Images of living people cannot be uploaded as fair use, since it's always possible to obtain a free image eventually. Additionally, please read WP:BIO for notability guidelines. The child of a famous person is not inherently notable. Acroterion (talk) 22:32, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
File:Oliver Twist.jpg ‎is quite obviously not self-made (were you on the set of the movie taking pictures?) You may not upload any images until you show that you understand and respect Wikipedia's image and copyright policies. You will be blocked if you keep uploading non-free files. Acroterion (talk) 22:36, 24 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of George Vuitton edit

Hello Wiki123qws,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged George Vuitton for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Pahazzard (talk) 21:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion (talk) 00:40, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
You ignored my clear warning to stop uploading images you found on the Internet to Wikipedia. You're blocked for 48 hours as a result. If you do this again after the block expires, you will be blocked indefinitely. Again:You may not upload images you've found on the Internet. Until you show that you understand this, you may not upload anything. Acroterion (talk) 00:42, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Some specific comments: your image uploads show no serious attempt to comply with Wikipedia requirements for sourcing or rationale for non-free images, even for historical images. Given that, I assume that you can't or won't observe Wikipedia norms for image uploads. Any recurrence will result in a permanent block unless you provide a detailed summary of your understanding of image policy in general and of the use of nonfree images before you upload any more images, and that it is reviewed and approved by an experienced Wikipedian. Acroterion (talk) 18:39, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The frito lay founder.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:The frito lay founder.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ///EuroCarGT 20:15, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Maurce mcdonald.jpg edit

 

A tag has been placed on File:Maurce mcdonald.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Blatant vandalism edit

Your recent additions to Richard and Maurice McDonald in which you added File:Richard mcdonld.jpg (which is clearly and image of Ray Kroc) and File:Maurce mcdonald.jpg (which is clearly an image of Maurice Richard), can only be viewed as vandalism -- an attempt to add blatantly false material to Wikipedia. Please desist. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:43, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Richard mcdonld.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Richard mcdonld.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion (talk) 22:05, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Since you specifically violated my warning not to upload images you've found on the Internet, and did so with clearly inappropriate rationales and clearly untruthful attribution ("it is mine"), you've been blocked indefinitely.Acroterion (talk) 22:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiki123qws (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i want to be unblocked because i did not steal anyone picture

Decline reason:

That image is clearly not yours. You say you find it on Google Images and also say "It is mine." Definitely a copyright violation, and based on your history, definitely worth of an indefinite block. only (talk) 00:56, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i was not trying to become the owner of the picture was just trying to post pictures — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki123qws (talkcontribs)

That response indicates that you clearly do not understand Wikipedia's copyright guidelines. Except under a very limited set of circumstances (known as fair use, you may only add pictures to Wikipedia that either you created yourself or that are in the public domain. Finding images on the internet means you did not create them yourself and that they are very likely not in the public domain. It doesn't help your cause when you try to deliberately mislead Wikipedia readers by uploading a picture of Maurice Richard and calling it a picture of Maurice McDonald, or a picture of Ray Kroc and calling that a picture of Richard McDonald. Such deliberate misrepresentation indicates to the rest of the community that you are probably not here to help. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

can you please unlock me and maybe like show me a way to copy and paste picture from the internet or let me make a picture cutout from a awebsite

No, I can't unblock you because I'm not an administrator. And no, I can't show you how to copy and paste a picture from the internet to Wikipedia because Wikipedia does not allow that. Your refusal to accept this fact will prevent you from being unblocked. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:13, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiki123qws (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i was trying to do my best in getting pictures from the internet without this block how ca i get pcture from google images and not get into trouble Wiki123qws (talk) 00:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Very simple answer: you cannot. And until you fully understand that and why you're going to remain blocked. The Bushranger One ping only 05:10, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You can't. That's why you were blocked, and unless you understand that you can't grab images off the Internet and copy them into Wikipedia, you won't be unblocked. Acroterion (talk) 00:50, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

then where can i grab pictures from?

For the last time: you can't. Images on Wikipedia are either user-created or have been explicitly released with a compatible copyright. Nearly everything you see on the Internet is copyrighted in some manner and very few meet Wikipedia's requirements. Since you appear to have no concept of copyright, you've been blocked and will not be unblocked until you demonstrate a full understanding of the subject. Acroterion (talk) 22:34, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

then can i just take a picture from my camera or from the cellphone and add it then

If you take a picture of something that's not copyrighted, yes: if you take a picture of a picture, or of something on a screen, absolutely not. What do you wish to post that is your own work in all respects? Acroterion (talk) 21:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

i was gonna take a picture for article i see to do and its a screen shoot

As I said, no screen shots: the content is copyrighted. Since you clearly have no notion of copyright, you'll stay blocked. Acroterion (talk) 00:59, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

ill try to take my own pictures when i can please unblock me now

i am gonna try y best to change please let e continue on my works

i think i have found a new way of editing picture please unblock me now

{{unblock|i have been trying get back to editing so can can i get blocked}}

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for copyright problems. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  PhilKnight (talk) 09:56, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply