User talk:Well-rested/Archives/2014/January

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Accountancy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Big Four, Occupation, Arthur Anderson and 1800s

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you :) -Well-rested^Talk 09:54, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK

Hello. Offline reference means a reference that I cannot access online (a book, magazine, without a URL link). Since we are unable to double check many references, we have the option of adding an approval AGF (=assuming good faith). --Soman (talk) 12:19, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Accounting research

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Accounting research may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * '''Experimental research''' examines data "the researcher gathered by [[[[Scientific control#Controlled experiments|administering treatments to subjects]]"; and
• * '''Analytical research''' is "based on the act of [[[[Scientific modelling|formally modeling]] [[theories]] or substantiating ideas in mathematical

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you :) -Well-rested^Talk 04:06, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Atlas with Wikified Globe.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:30, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2014 WikiCup!

Hello Well-rested, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition began on 1 January. There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! J Milburn (talk · contribs), The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 20:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Accounting research

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Accounting research you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Simplysavvy -- Simplysavvy (talk) 07:12, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. :) Looking forward to your comments. :) -Well-rested^Talk 07:21, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Accounting, Organisations and Society

Hello! Your submission of Accounting, Organisations and Society at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Guerillero | My Talk 04:17, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of AACSB-accredited schools (accounting), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Washington, St. John's University and Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:38, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks :) -Well-rested^Talk 18:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Earnings management

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for The Accounting Review

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Convergence of accounting standards

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Convergence of accounting standards you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Antidiskriminator -- Antidiskriminator (talk) 18:11, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for writing that article which is certainly needed. I would appreciate if you can reply to the remarks on the talk page as I go along.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:43, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Thats ok. There is no deadline. My second remark about the coverage is quite serious and depending on your answer on that remark I will continue with review or not.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Voluntary disclosure

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Voluntary disclosure you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 17:31, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for List of accounting journals

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:03, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Accounting research

The article Accounting research you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Accounting research for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 02:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Voluntary disclosure

The article Voluntary disclosure you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Voluntary disclosure for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 03:41, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Earnings management

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Earnings management you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 03:42, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Accounting Review

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Accounting Review you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 03:41, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, Well-rested, I've left a query for you at Talk:The Accounting Review/GA1. — Cirt (talk) 05:00, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Accounting, Organisations and Society

Hello! Your submission of Accounting, Organisations and Society at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 13:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Earnings management

The article Earnings management you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Earnings management for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 20:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Reply

No problems, Well-rested, like I said, as long as I see you're making some good progress towards good article quality, that's a good thing. Keep me posted, — Cirt (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC)