Weirdude
re: BCA emblem edit
Thanks. GFDL is a perfectly acceptable license. Remember, however, that anybody now may take this emblem off wikipedia and use it for any purpose, including modifying it. They can sell tee-shorts, etc. There is now no restriction for its use at all, except that wikipedia must be cited as a source. This is highly unlikley, of course, but is why the con-commercial use only license that it was originally uploaded under was not allowed. JERRY talk contribs 19:24, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
The file File:BCA EMB.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 June 2019 (UTC)