This user reads newspapers.

Not just a SPA edit

Note the complexity of these topics from 1999-2007, the high credibility and quality of the source references (sighted and verifiably linked), the breath/scale objective import of topic areas addressed but through neutral, factual articles about multinational corporations, international front-page news reported events, and rather unusual & documented censorship of same. Also references on extensive government actions, court judgment findings, and fact-referenced information about prominent notable individuals are each of value for the Wikipedia community and Encyclopedia. Additional contributions by Wikipedia's collective wisdom, alternate perspectives, sourcing additional objective facts and information, ideally with source reference links, are highly encouraged. I'm new to Wikipedia so please be excuse my learning formats, protocols, and people; but the information contributed is objective, credible source verified, and notable. Please do not casually dismiss or simply delete.

Notable Individuals and Source References edit

A tag has been placed on Larry Sonsini, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. ???

Larry Sonsini is clearly a notable individual. He is a prominent attorney mentioned in myriad credible verifiable publications including The New York Times quote: "LARRY W. SONSINI, Silicon Valley’s most feared and sought-after lawyer" [[1]], also often mentioned in the The Wall Street Journal [[2]], and ranks eighth on the Forbes Midas Wikipedia list of "Technology's Top Dealmakers" [[3]]. Larry Sonsini is also personally referenced as a notible individual in the Wikipedia Article on the also notable individual Viet D. Dinh the former Assistant Attorney General of the United States where Larry Sonsini is attributed as a individual in the Wikipedia article on the HP spying scandal and a is related to the article on stock Options backdating. He is also a founder and current active Chairman of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. Sonsini is personally notably referenced in many Widipedia articles already, these collective are why the subject is notable and should be included in Wikipedia. Not just deleted.

US Censorship by Google edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Censorship by Google, is not consistent with our policy on attribution and verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 07:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)- Vwt note ZimZalaBim has retired from Wikipedia and does not respond to talk dialog.Reply

The Wikipedia Article on Censorship by Google was added a referenced attributed example The Wall Street Journal Newspaper articles and photographs (international printed newspaper front covers, thus public domain text and images). These can not be found in Google News Search or Google Image Search. These, like the China reference, are examples of US news and images, censored by Google. This example shows Google does not only censor China news and images. This is a notable, reference attributed, credible publication's link to objective neutral referenced facts and images (newspaper covers and court judgments), censored from Google, thus documenting censorship by Google in the Wikipedia article on Censorship by Google.

The attribition source cited is The Wall Street Journal online, generally considered reliable. The verifiable attribution, including online links are to the Wall Street Journal, published news and images. Censorship of this myCFO news article and the front page cover images of myCFO's board of directors are verifiably censored from Google News, Google Image, and Google in the US. Apparently this extensive research report Wikipedia has deleted too, but this news is still on The Wall Street Journal online and international print editions from March 2007 [[4]] .

MyCFO Corporation and source reference article in The Wall Street Journal edit

If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. OK, administrators who have deleted this article do not respond to talk...

This Wikipedia is article entry is describing in a NPOV 'myCFO' as a substantial operating corporation. myCFO, in operations since 1999, is discussed in detail in a verifiable external link to a credible authenticated reference source article in the Wall Street Journal, a reliable reference source publication with objective substance and well established edited reference fact checking credibility.

The company myCFO is tax accounting and financial services firm started in 1999 to help wealthy Silicon Valley individuals manage their fortunes. Most (but not all) of myCFO's assets and operations were sold to Harris Bank in late 2002 and now operate as Harris myCFO providing the same services. myCFO is the subject of a March 6th 2007 Wall Street Journal Front Cover Investigative Report [5]. Regarding notability, this 2007 WSJ article follows onto the related October 17 2005 press release "The Justice Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) today announced the filing of a superseding criminal indictment in the largest criminal tax case ever filed." [[6]]

myCFO article restore requested edit

MyCFO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore|cache|AfD)

myCFO Inc. founded in 1999, is presently partly operating as Harris myCFO, and is a substantial multinational multifacited corporation, involved in many complex activities including financial services, accounting, banking, tax advice, and tax preparation. myCFO is easily verifiable and relates to a range of topics. The Wikipedia article, the only one describing myCFO, is directly attributed to a reliable newsprint and online credible objective reference source, The Wall Street Journal specfically a March 6, 2007 Internationally Published Newspaper Front Page Cover Fold Story (thus public domain headline, news text, and cover image are also public display copyright fair use with attribution). The reference article is externally linked to a source reference attribution [[7]] This attributed WSJ article is itself linked to the wsjonline.com were attributed references used for the investigative report can be found, and the wsj even provides further online links directly to original source documents referenced and cited in the WSJ source article. The WSJ myCFO article references many corporations and individuals who each meet Wikipedia notability criteria. This same WSJ article also references multiple US Government agencies and public record actions specifically referenced by the WSJ article and notable. Notable facts are reported in a neutral point of view that merits this article about myCFO to be included in Wikipedia. Vwt is the editor originating this article’s references to the 2007 Wall Street Journal and the online linked reference sources. My recomendation is to consolidate and merge myCFO related references into one article: "myCFO" which is distinct from, but related to Harris myCFO.

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WSJ myCFO Headline Photos.gif) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:WSJ myCFO Headline Photos.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please you have edited by clicking on the "my contribucheck whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pagestions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 80.221.13.183 23:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

See Source Links to a fair use of The Wall Street Journal Front Cover Story Image Source of "myCFO's Board": [[8]] front page news File:WSJ myCFO Headline Newspaper Photos.gif

This fair use image is from the Front Page Cover Fold of The Wall Street Journal March 6, 2007 Print Edition exhibited the example the US News and Newspapers censored in US in the Censorship by Google Article. Explanation of these are the censored news items have been deleted from the articles (as well as Google News). This image copyright image, here in fair use, is referenced at [[9]]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WSJ Cover myCFO Board Photos.png) edit

Thanks for uploading Image:WSJ Cover myCFO Board Photos.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 80.221.13.183 23:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:WSJ Cover myCFO Board Photos.png Links to a fair use of The Wall Street Journal Front Cover Story Image Source of "myCFO's Board": [[10]]

This fair use image is a Newspaper Front Page Cover of the Wall Street Journal exhibited as the example in Newspaper Cover Images censored in the US in the Censorship by Google Article, Explanation of these censored news items have been deleted from the articles. Explanation of these are the censored examples news items have been deleted from the articles (as well as Google Image).

Don't change other's comments edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 64.69.123.130 21:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest? edit

BTW, what is your relationship to MyCFO. All of your edits appear to be in relation to this company and that WSJ investigation you keep pushing. Please be aware that we have policies regarding conflicts of interest between editors and the articles they contribute to. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.90.11.62 (talk) 18:36, 1 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Assuming you are the same Vwt who made comments in these blog posts [11] [12] [13], I think you do have a conflict of interest here. 24.90.11.62 02:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Peter Solvik edit

 

An editor has nominated Peter Solvik, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Solvik and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Peter Solvik edit

 

The article Peter Solvik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP of non notable businessman.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 00:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Peter Solvik for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Solvik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Solvik (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 00:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply