Voortle

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Lockdown drill into Safety drill. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 02:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Voortle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pic N' Save

Hello Voortle,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pic N' Save for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TimothyJosephWood 15:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pic N' Save (Northeast Florida store chain)

The article Pic N' Save (Northeast Florida store chain) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Voortle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

A word listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A word. Since you had some involvement with the A word redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve 271 (number)

Hi, I'm Domdeparis. Voortle, thanks for creating 271 (number)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. please add sources to back up what you wrote and show this meets WP:WINI

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Dom from Paris (talk) 09:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Sorry this should have gone to another editors page who removed the redirect. Dom from Paris (talk) 09:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 271 (number) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 271 (number) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/271 (number) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:54, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Voortle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

1,000,000,000,000,000 AD listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1,000,000,000,000,000 AD. Since you had some involvement with the 1,000,000,000,000,000 AD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:45, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

1,000,000,000 AD listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1,000,000,000 AD. Since you had some involvement with the 1,000,000,000 AD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:49, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

1,000,000,000,000 AD listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1,000,000,000,000 AD. Since you had some involvement with the 1,000,000,000,000 AD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:50, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

1,000,000 AD listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1,000,000 AD. Since you had some involvement with the 1,000,000 AD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:52, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

10^40 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 10^40. Since you had some involvement with the 10^40 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. B dash (talk) 02:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

"Escaping the Earth" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Escaping the Earth. Since you had some involvement with the Escaping the Earth redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

"Colonization of the Sun" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Colonization of the Sun. Since you had some involvement with the Colonization of the Sun redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 18:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

"Yellow dwarf colonization" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yellow dwarf colonization. Since you had some involvement with the Yellow dwarf colonization redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:32, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

"Phuck" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Phuck. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 28#Phuck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:56, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

"You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you." listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you.. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 12#You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 02:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

"2590s" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2590s. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 6#2590s until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

"−10" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect −10. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 31#−10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:35, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Venusians for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Venusians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Venusians (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

"4570s" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 4570s and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 20#4570s until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

A very large number of your "nth century" redirects listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with many of your redirects of the format "nth century" and has thus listed them for discussion. These discussions will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#42-91th, 96th-97th centuries, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#93rd-95th centuries, Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#92th, 98th-99th centuries and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28#41st century until consensuses are reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 00:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC), edited 14:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

"Colonization of other universes" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Colonization of other universes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 7 § Colonization of other universes until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 05:53, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of My Teacher Ate My Homework

The article My Teacher Ate My Homework has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. No reviews from Reliable Sources found. Tagged for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of My Teacher Ate My Homework for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Teacher Ate My Homework is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Teacher Ate My Homework until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 10:41, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

"287 (Number)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 287 (Number) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 13 § 287 (Number) until a consensus is reached. Dhrm77 (talk) 16:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

"Colonization of the Sun (Lagrange Points)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Colonization of the Sun (Lagrange Points) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 28 § Colonization of the Sun (Lagrange Points) until a consensus is reached. Thryduulf (talk) 22:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)