VoodooIsland

UpdateUpdate

Articles I've created a new one (or substantially rewritten)http://www.networkadvertising.org/? EventFilter, and I will be in town. We have been working on the other side of the most important thing >

→ Show userboxes ←
Userboxes This user is an Atheist This user is a Libertarian This user is a staunch supporter of Israel This user supports full independence of and full diplomatic relations with Taiwan This user feels that direct democracy is Un-American This user supports sex education This user supports same-sex marriage This user opposes abortion; though strongly supports a woman's right to choose

Articles I've created a new one. I am a beautiful person, I

Re

Oh, you did? My bad...the red/yellow/gray colors in the history messes me up sometimes. Sorry for the inconvenience. --haha169 (talk) 04:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Same-sex marriage in Colorado, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Same-sex marriage in Colorado was changed by VoodooIsland (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-04-10T16:59:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

My bad, I forgot to add Colorado to the end of it. I fixed it. VoodooIsland (talk) 17:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Mexico Civil Unions consideration

Here is that article where it discusses possible same-sex civil unions in the Mexican states I mentioned :) http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2008/11/26/mexicomix112608.DTL&type=printable Liberal92 (talk) 22:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome! :) Are you going to update the map to highlight those states in yellow, as I suggested on the map? hahaLiberal92 (talk) 22:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Mille Fleur

You did a really nice job on Mille Fleur. But the Mille Fleur is just the name of the most popular color of the breed, whose actual full name is Belgian Bearded d'Uccle. See mypetchicken and feathersite for more. Thanks, Steven Walling (talk) 03:25, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

I went ahead and combined this user's info with the d'Uccle, but I'm not sure if it looks proper. Either of you please revert if you feel changes should be made. Iluvfruit (talk) 07:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Template talk:Same-sex unions

I removed your question from this page, as Wikipedia is not a WP:Forum for questions like you posted. However, check out http://www.365gay.com/news/illinois-takes-up-gay-marriage-bill/ for an answer. http://www.365gay.com is a great source for gay news. CTJF83Talk 03:39, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

re: LGBT rights infoboxes

thanks, i don't mind at all :-) -- i hadn't even gotten to asia yet, and along with Africa it is where most of the homosexuality criminalized countries are. If you run across any countries where you need more info than the article or LGBT rights by country or territory provides, the ILGA 2008 report is generally a pretty good source for penalties for illegal countries, and years when homosexuality was legalized for legal countries (and an appendix listing countries with gender/relationships/discrimination laws, though it is only current as of may 2008). Wikignome0529 (talk) 23:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

hmmmmmmm......personally, i'm kind of leery of putting "not enforced" in lgbt rights tables / infoboxes type stuff, since if a law is on the books (even if it is not regularly enforced), the possibility is still there. i don't see any problem with adding something like "rarely enforced" or a different brief note though (especially Fiji as you mentioned). the illegal countries' infoboxes are shorter anyway (since most of the infobox's sections aren't used on them), so fleshing out the illegal box a little shouldn't hurt it much.

btw, i forgot to mention earlier that though the ILGA report is a good resource, i actually ran into a possible mistake in it the other day.... one of the South or East African countries was listed as female legal in ILGA, but the country's Wikipedia article cited an African website which said the laws were used against lesbians also.... so, it is is a good resource (but if you see contradicting info, its interpretation of the laws might be wrong). just a word of caution. Wikignome0529 (talk) 09:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Template: Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe

I'm not sure how to edit this particular template; but I'd like to point out that "Great Britain" isn't a region in the UK, it is the UK. So that should be removed from the parenthesis after UK. Thanks! --haha169 (talk) 21:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Reverting multiple edits at once

I noticed how you spent quite a few edits reverting wiki's several edits. There is an easy way to revert them all in one shot. Just click on the date of the edit you want to revert to - edit the file, and save. Just a little tip. :) --haha169 (talk) 22:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Update template

When you use {{Update}}, please leave a note on the talk page of the article saying what needs to be updated, because while you may know what needs to be updated, others who want to update the article may not know, and readers will not know much about what information is outdated, and the article will die of neglect. Niew (talk) 23:40, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Communism and homosexuality

On July 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Communism and homosexuality, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 21:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Recognition of same-sex couples in Italy

Hi! I've searched Italian-language sites for more information about "DiDoRe", the proposed unregistered cohabitation scheme in Italy. The proposal has not been formally withdrawn, and it was still being written about as late as April 2009. See this article, for example, which actually states that DiDoRe will be voted upon by the end of 2009. Of course, given the history of such proposals in Italy, it is not even guaranteed that it will come to a vote (it is not an official part of the government's programme). The actual law (in Italian) can be found here. My understanding is that it will be a very limited scheme, chiefly concerned with hospital visitation and mutual responsibility. It will not offer pension or welfare rights and is explicit in stating that cohabitating couples under DiDoRe do not constitute a family. So, it's sort of a "first step" or institutional framework which succeeding governments can add to; if implemented, it will leave Greece as the last of the EU-15 states to have no form of same-sex union recognition. Although, a similar law is expected in Greece if the Socialists come to power at the next elections (largely probable). Thank you too, for all the work you've done on Same-sex marriage legislation around the world! Ronline ✉ 08:54, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Italy is indeed far behind the rest of Western Europe. Public support for recognition of same-sex unions is comparable to neighbouring countries, even though support for same-sex marriage is only around 40%. Nevertheless, I think it will be very difficult for Italy to go straight to same-sex marriage. The influence of the Vatican on public policy is still very high, even if the Vatican's views are not in line with those of the electorate. If this DiDoRe law is passed, it's likely that a future left-wing government will expand it incrementally. It is also possible that, like in Scandinavia in the early 1990s, a future left-wing government will pass a new, more comprehensive civil union law operating alongside unregistered cohabitation.

In Greece, it is the left-wing PASOK party that supports rights for same-sex couples, while the right-wing New Democracy Party supports an opposite-sex-only unregistered cohabitation law. Unlike in other countries, the impetus for such a law comes mainly from opposite-sex unmarried couples. Thus, it is quite easy politically for the government to exclude same-sex couples. Portugal did this too in the late 1990s, before expanding the scheme to same-sex couples two years later. More notoriously, Australia has recognised opposite-sex unarried partners for decades, but only extended these rights to same-sex couples in 2008. Nevertheless, an election will take place in Greece in October 2009, and if PASOK wins that election, which is expected, it is quite likely that same-sex couples will be recognised.

Finally, Bulgaria: I think what happened was the former Socialist government wanted to introduce an unregistered cohabitation scheme. It was mainly intended for opposite-sex couples but there was debate within its ranks over whether it should include same-sex couples. It never came to fruition, since a new liberal conservative government was elected a few months ago. I'm not sure what their stance on the law is. (The debate in Bulgaria is quite similar to that in Greece).

On a related note: Jersey will debate civil partnerships in October. It will probably join Austria and Ireland as "new recognisers" of same-sex partnerships in 2009. Progress on marriage equality is also expected in Iceland, Slovenia and Luxembourg, and perhaps also in Portugal and Andorra. Ronline ✉ 05:09, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Miyuki Hatoyama

On September 7, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Miyuki Hatoyama, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 00:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Same-sex marriage in Australia

Hi! I notice that you've re-inserted Australia over at Same-sex marriage legislation around the world. I'm actually a bit unsure about whether or not it should be there. You're right in saying that the Senate Committee's recommendation to not pass the bill is not technically binding on the Parliament, and has not officially killed the bill. Furthermore, the bill is still officially "Before the Senate", as its official page shows. However, it essentially has zero chances of being brought to a vote in the Senate. This would probably have been the case even if the Senate Committee had voted in favour of it. Both of the major parties in Australia are opposed to same-sex marriage; the bill was a private member's bill introduced by a Green Party senator. Yesterday, there were marches for same-sex marriage in all the major Australian cities, but their focus was mainly to protest against the Senate Comittee's finding and to work towards the future, rather than to call for the bill to be brought before a vote. From the way that the SSM debate in Australia is heading, I don't think Australia will pass same-sex marriage in the next few years: Kevin Rudd is opposed, as are most figures in the dominant Right faction of the governing Labor Party. This is, of course, despite public support of 60% for SSM.

Finally, the fact that the bill has not been officially withdrawn does not amount to much. In 2008, a similar bill was introduced by the Greens which did not even go to a Senate Committee, but which is still shown on its official page as being "Before the Senate". It is my understanding that all bills introduced in a given Senate session will remain active until the end of the session (which is in mid to late 2010, when the next federal elections take place).

So, the question of when we should change the article to signal the rejection of the bill is a difficult one. Another difficult question is what date to insert: should it be the date when the Senate Committee gave its negative recommendation, or the date when the Senate session ended and the bill formally became inactive? Or the date when the bill was introduced? This is of course not only about Australia: in many other countries, relationship recognition bills have been introduced and have not proceeded to a vote. My suggestion is that we should list a bill as being rejected as soon as there are reasonably firm indicators it will not proceed to a vote, such as official statements from major parties. Furthermore, in these cases, the date in the article should be the date when the bill was introduced (in this case, June 2009). Let me know what you think! (On a slightly unrelated note, the global SSM movement is becoming incredibly interesting, what with the recent developments in Mexico City and Argentina) Ronline ✉ 13:48, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply! I don't mind if you go on and on, I thought your observations were very interesting! I too am interested in SSM in non-Western countries; currently living between Taiwan and Australia, I can see the similarities and differences in gay rights discourses in the two countries. Just a few comments:

Australia - I think the resistance to SSM and even civil unions among the major parties is unique for a progressive Western country that otherwise has a good gay rights record and relatively high public support for SSM. The Australian Christian Lobby and related groups seem to be the main force holding back progress, particularly since many high-profile figures in the Australian Labor Party are practicing Christians. What Australia also lacks is an openly LGBT person in government who is willing to publicly and vocally push the issue (there is an openly gay minister, Penny Wong, but she's so far been pretty much silent on marriage equality). It is often said that SSM will only be legalised in Australia under a post-Kevin-Rudd Labor Government, which could be many years away, even a decade (when the very pro-SSM young generation take greater control).

Asia - Indeed, the political apathy in Asia seems to be the main force holding back same-sex union recognition. This is not just an exclusively LGBT issue; in general, the concept of "identity politics" or "minority rights" does not feature prominently in Asian political discourse (aside from as a Western influence). The same applies to liberal concepts such as "equality before the law". As a result, LGBT rights groups cannot draw on these discourses in the same way as they can in the Western world, where LGBT rights activists were and continue to be inspired by the struggle for women's rights, indigenous rights, immigrant rights, etc. Furthermore, a social contract of sorts seems to have been "negotiated" between the heterosexual majority and LGBT people: LGBT people are provided with "lifestyle spaces", including vibrant nightlife scenes, as well as an absence of violent homophobia, which prevents them from "rising up" in the same way as in the post-Stonewall West. Even in legally-repressive countries such as Singapore and the United Arab Emirates, LGBT people are largely left alone as long as they stick to "entertainment" and "consumption" and do not agitate politically. Of course, I think Nepal can provide a turning point for the region, by finally showing a real example of how SSM can work in an Asian country. Taiwan is the other place to watch in the near future, although, as you pointed out, it is entirely possible that some other country will legalise SSM in an "opportunistic" fashion, perhaps less due to a genuine desire to grant LGBT equality and more due to a desire to raise its global profile and improve revenues.

Eastern Europe/Albania - I'm of Romanian origin and I've followed the LGBT rights debate over there quite closely, and I think Eastern Europe is peculiar in that intra-regional influence seems to be very low. My impression is that, in Western Europe, SSM laws have tended to cluster regionally: Spain influenced Portugal (and Latin America), the Netherlands influenced Belgium and now Luxembourg, and Norway influenced Sweden, which is influencing Iceland, etc. There seems to be a lot less of this in Eastern Europe: in Romania, for example, the recognition of same-sex unions in Hungary, Czechia, Slovenia and Croatia is pretty much ignored or unknown. So, I think that if Albania does legalise SSM, it is not particularly likely to "diffuse" to other countries in the region. A partial reason for this is the cultural isolation of Albania to the rest of the region; it is non-Slavic, and cultural divisions remain high in the wake of the Balkan Wars of the 1990s. The only country it could plausibly have an influence on is Romania, where similar support of SSM has been voiced before by the President. Of course, that doesn't mean no progress can be made in Eastern Europe, at least in those countries which are EU members. Slovenia is set to legalise SSM soon, and Estonia will legalise some form of unions (probably unregistered cohabitation). Slovakia and Bulgaria may make some progress in the medium term (2-4 years). The real holdouts are Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania, although even there one must remember that organised anti-gay movements are quite recent, and may very well prove to be a passing trend. Poland nearly legalised civil unions in 2004, and I think it has an undeservedly bad image for homophobia when on some indicators, like support for an openly gay head of state or neighbour, it is the most progressive country in Eastern Europe, comparable to Finland!

All in all, the next decade should prove to be very eventful in this area (if unprecitable, as always)! Ronline ✉ 10:37, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Kamerun map.png

Thank you for uploading File:Kamerun map.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FinalRapture - † ☪ 21:14, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

orthographic maps

When you replace a map, make sure you leave a copy of the detailed one somewhere in the article. Detailed maps are useful, that's why they're there. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 03:45, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Problem with map

Looks like there's some sort of color fill error near Equatorial Guinea in some of your African maps, including this one.. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Problems with maps

Hello. I noticed you've added quite a few new maps to the articles on the various countries in Africa. While I can appreciate your attempts at standardizing some of these maps, there are a number of problems with your edits. First and foremost, the maps are original research. That is, they are not based on any authoritative mapping source such as the United Nations. You have suggested in a couple of your edits that the maps "includes AU in light green" and are "based on orthographic maps for EU member states". However, if one looks closely at your maps, we see that you have striped in light green and grey the northwestern part of Somalia, an area which corresponds with the secessionist Somaliland region. This is problematic because neither the European Union nor the African Union nor the United Nations nor any other international organization or country in the world (i.e. the international community as a whole) recognizes the region as anything other than a part of Somalia (see CIA); only the separatists themselves consider it an independent nation. The maps could not therefore have been based on either the EU or the AU or on any other authoritative source. The official map of Somalia looks like this. Secondly, quite a few of the maps awkwardly shade out Morocco, ostensibly because it is not a part of the African Union, although it is of course an actual nation in Africa. Basing the maps on something as amorphous as AU membership is likewise problematic since not all nations in Africa are members and countries routinely fall under suspension (e.g. Eritrea, Guinea, Niger, Madagascar). The maps therefore have no staying power either. The light green background color also provides a far less effective contrast with the shaded country in the foreground's dark green hue than do the original maps with their colored countries against a plain grey background. Many of the original maps you replaced are also closeups of the countries in question, something your maps do not offer. This is especially relevant when one takes into account physically small nations such as Equatorial Guinea and the Gambia, countries which appear as little more than unintelligible dots on your maps. Given the above, I have restored the original maps on all of the relevant country pages. Regards, Middayexpress (talk) 04:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Problems with maps

Hello. I have a question regarding the map of Empire of Japan. In Japanese history, Korea was once a colony of Japan,too. However, in this map of "Great Japanese Empire",Korea was colored green – indicating that Korea was once Japanese territory. In that case, why is Taiwan not colored green also?
jp.大日本帝國
Korean under the Japanese rule --D111010219 (talk) 10:50, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your responded.
But I just have some questions.
Why was Korea a part of the integrity as the Great Japanese Empire, but Taiwan NOT?
Japan officially claimed that Korea is their "territory(外地)" , which is the same meaning of colony, and Taiwan is too(外地). However,Japan claimed that the South Pacific Islands are their mandated territories defined as merely a "trusteeship(委任管理)", is"委任管理",not the"外地". At that age, the political status of Taiwan was also comparable to that of Alaska. Taiwan can't comparable to the Samoa's status.

I had ever given you the statement in the web of Japan Wikipedia and you should take a look, because I thought it's more credible after looking through the Japanese version of wiki.
Taiwan under the Japanese rule
Korean under the Japanese rule
--D111010219 (talk) 14:35, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Italian Empire

Hi, I have just seen the file you created "Italian colonial Empire". There are two problems with this map : 1st : the title, "colonial". Some territories were not colonies and the title creates confusion between occupied country and colonies. 2nd : most important mistake, Ethiopia is colored in "lime" as a colony when it actually was an occupied country for 5 years. If you could correct those errors I would really appreciate it. Thanks --Vob08 (talk) 19:49, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

request

Would you upload this file (file:Manchukuo.png) at commons? thanks :) I want to use this file at ko.wiki. --kwan-in (talk) 08:57, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

File:French_indochina_map.png

nice Decora (talk) 20:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Italian Colonial Empire.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:Italian Colonial Empire.png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Italian Colonial Empire.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Italian Colonial Empire.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Colonial SC.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:02, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Colonial NC.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Colonial VA.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

• Another one of your uploads, File:Colonial Carolina.png, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:07, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Ivory coast in au.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ivory coast in au.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:05, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Re: Recognition of same-sex unions in Ukraine

Hello VoodooIsland I have added projects Human rights, Politics, LGBT studies, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 19:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Djibouti in au.png

The file File:Djibouti in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by File:Location Djibouti AU Africa.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:19, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Gabon in au.png

The file File:Gabon in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Superseded by File:Location Gabon AU Africa.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:28, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Italian Colonial Empire.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Italian Colonial Empire.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. HouseBlaster^talk 00:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Mali in au.png

The file File:Mali in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Mali AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Malawi in au.png

The file File:Malawi in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Malawi AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:51, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Somalia in au.png

The file File:Somalia in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Somalia AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:52, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Swaziland in au.png

The file File:Swaziland in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Swaziland AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:53, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Madagascar in au.png

The file File:Madagascar in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Madagascar AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:27, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Lesotho in au.png

The file File:Lesotho in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Lesotho AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:27, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Togo in au.png

The file File:Togo in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Togo AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Liberia in au.png

The file File:Liberia in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Liberia AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Senegal in au.png

The file File:Senegal in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Senegal AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Sudan in au.png

The file File:Sudan in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Sudan AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Mozambique in au.png

The file File:Mozambique in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Mozambique AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Nigeria in au.png

The file File:Nigeria in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Nigeria AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Egypt in au.png

The file File:Egypt in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Egypt AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Tanzania in au.png

The file File:Tanzania in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Tanzania AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ethiopia in au.png

The file File:Ethiopia in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Ethiopia AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Libya in au.png

The file File:Libya in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Libya AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Tunisia in au.png

The file File:Tunisia in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Tunisia AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Rwanda in au.png

The file File:Rwanda in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Rwanda AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Uganda in au.png

The file File:Uganda in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Uganda AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Guinea in au.png

The file File:Guinea in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Guinea AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:The gambia in au.png

The file File:The gambia in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Gambia AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:31, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:South africa in au.png

The file File:South africa in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location South Africa AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Dr congo in au.png

The file File:Dr congo in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Democratic Republic of the Congo AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Equatorial guinea in au.png

The file File:Equatorial guinea in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Equatorial Guinea AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Sierra leone in au.png

The file File:Sierra leone in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Sierra Leone AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Eritrea in au.png

The file File:Eritrea in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Eritrea AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Mauritania in au.png

The file File:Mauritania in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Mauritania AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Niger in au.png

The file File:Niger in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Niger AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Guinea-bissau in au.png

The file File:Guinea-bissau in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Guinea Bissau AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Namibia in au.png

The file File:Namibia in au.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Location Namibia AU Africa.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)