Vnk414

Hello

Kindly do not add information to an article without a source, as you did at Air India destinations. Regards — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 04:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, I'm Clubjustin. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of Airbus A350 XWB orders and deliveries— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 09:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Indira Gandhi International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 05:28, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Doha from Mumbai and Delhi

Hello there. A rule while adding any new destination is that there should be a firm date to the commencement of the route by the airline. Although you have provided a reliable source, there is no firm date mentioned anywhere in the source for Doha. We are not a crystal ball to predict future. Also go through WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 06:23, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Pune Airport. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 06:51, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add improperly cited material to Wikipedia, as you did at TruJet. Time and again, you have been asked not to add information on new destinations or a new airline unless there is a firm date. We are not a site to add premonitions to the existing information. It would be productive if you read the guidelines linked in your warnings than ignoring them. Consider this your last warning. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 15:48, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Vistara. Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Air India. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ace505 (talk) 17:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shirdi Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alliance Air (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Zoom Air. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you, CathayA350Aviation (talk) 16:50, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Vnk414. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at IndiGo. Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:59, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Possible Modern Fire socking. Home Lander (talk) 15:39, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for continued removal of material, as you did at Vistara. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sam Chui

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sam Chui, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Boleyn (talk) 16:16, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia articles must do more than tell about a person. They must indicate with independent reliable sources how the subject meets notability guidelines, in this case those for biographies at WP:BIO. The article you created had no sources. In order for the person to merit an article here, they must have been written about by others. 331dot (talk) 20:10, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Chui (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sam Chui and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sam Chui, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:09, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Vnk414! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:09, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sam Chui has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sam Chui. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:07, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Vnk414. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Draft:Sam Chui, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 11:09, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi Vnk414. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article, Draft:Sam Chui. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 15:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC) . I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 15:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Chui (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sam Chui and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sam Chui, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 08:00, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Chui (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Smmurphy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sam Chui and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sam Chui, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Smmurphy^(Talk) 15:06, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Chui (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sam Chui and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sam Chui, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Winged Blades^Godric 15:10, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Chui (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sam Chui and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sam Chui, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:44, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Sam Chui

There is nothing here that indicates that he satisfies Wikipedia’s criteria for notability. I understand that you might think so however it is clear from the previous comments from other editors that no one else shares this view. Wikipedia has clear criteria on what constitutes a notable article and after searching I cannot find anything that changes my view. Dan arndt (talk) 12:24, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

• Refer to the criteria under WP:ANYBIO - essentially significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources, not blog sites, press releases, personal websites or mere mentions in passing - which means none of the references you’ve provided to dates are satisfactory. Dan arndt (talk) 12:56, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Sam Chui

Draft:Sam Chui, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sam Chui and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Sam Chui during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ~ Winged Blades^Godric 15:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Vnk414. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)