Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Sri lanka state Terrorism article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page.

I also wanted to note that, even without the copyright issues, this piece of text would not be suitable as an encyclopedia article in it's current form, as it appears to be more of an news/opinion piece. There are some guidelines about writing articles at Your first article and the Help Desk should be able to answer any questions you have. Thanks --Kateshortforbob talk 09:38, 18 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Kinship Terms in Sumerian and Tamil edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kinship Terms in Sumerian and Tamil, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://arutkural.tripod.com/sumstudies/kinship-sum-tam.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Morphological and semantic identities withSumerian edit

 

A tag has been placed on Morphological and semantic identities withSumerian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 08:17, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kinship Terms in Sumerian and Tamil edit

 

A tag has been placed on Kinship Terms in Sumerian and Tamil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 08:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

November 2009 edit

Hello,

You have been blocked for repeatedly introducing copyrighted material onto Wikipedia without permission. While we would still welcome contributions made in your own words, please understand that your current actions expose Wikipedia to potential legal claims and as such, your contributions cannot be used anywhere on this project.

Before doing anything further, please spend some time reviewing our copyright policies and the FAQ on copyrights. If you understand these and still decide to contribute constructively, you may request an unblock below. MLauba (talk) 11:20, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MLauba (talk) 11:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • The advice above may be soemwhat misleading. I suspect you are the author of the essays you have posted. Please also read our rules about original research. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:52, 5 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


{{unblock|1=Hi as i am new to wikipedia editing sections, i made mistakes . I am sincerly appologies for that . From now onwards , i will contribute to the wikipedia in my own words with the references for the articles / research papers i am across . Request you to please unblock me to make a constructive contributions}}

 

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

No objections, the indef duration was chosen due to the infrequent activity. I trust you have understood our concerns and we're looking forward to your future contributions.
Please do also note the comments of RHarwoth above, however, and if you are the author of material you posted elsewhere, there is actually a way to re-use it here provided the content passes our other content guidelines. For donating copyrighted material you own to Wikipedia, follow the process at WP:DCM.

Request handled by: MLauba (talk) 01:45, 19 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

File source problem with File:Vijayakanth22.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Vijayakanth22.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:06, 25 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 21:06, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2011 edit

  Your addition to Tondaiman Ilanthirayan has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 10:40, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply