User talk:Visik/Archive/2011/Apr

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Nomination for deletion of Genus navboxes templates

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Genus navbox templates, such as {{Prunus sect. Prunocerasus}} have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rkitko ^(talk) 00:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. --Visik (talk) 09:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Of course. I know we discussed these before. I just finally got around to asking the rest of the community what they think of these navboxes. If consensus is to keep, I'll go ahead and fix the italic formatting with them. Cheers, Rkitko ^(talk) 13:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Congrats. You won by default with no oppose. I thought it would be re-listed for further discussion to reach consensus. Guessed administrators have discretion to re-list or act on no oppose as consensus. --Visik (talk) 04:04, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

I was surprised by that, myself. I don't think they got a fair shake. If you want to, put it up for WP:Deletion review to get more of a discussion on them. Rkitko ^(talk) 12:01, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Strange subpages

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is quite the long subpage, User talk:Visik/Archives/2010/October/Archives/2011/February/Archives/2011/February/Archives/2011/February/Archives/2011/March/Archives/2011/March/Archives/2011/March/Archives/2011/March/Archives/2011/March, a bot error? There are many more, see here. Frietjes (talk) 18:40, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi there. Yes the bot screwed up my archives. I have been trying to fix it for ages. I did manage to get the admins to delete a few. Looks like there is more tidying up to do. Thanks for the notice. --Visik (talk) 01:53, 4 April 2011 (UTC)