Vietnamvat
Re edit
Sorry, I don't understand what you're trying to say on my talk page. What article? Please reply here. Materialscientist (talk) 21:53, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hello. I'd be very interested to know why, on 25 February 2014, you deleted my User page. It states: "25 February 2014 Materialscientist (talk | contribs) deleted page User:Vietnamvat (G3: Vandalism)". I'm mystified as to why you did this. Thank you so much.
Firstly, thanks for all the effort you are putting into this article. I have, however, tagged it for lack of references. Ideally, a reference should be provided for every fact stated and at least once per paragraph. In particular, the "Notable Old Bedfordians" must be referenced, especially for living people. I see you have just added Colville Wemyss as an old boy. You should add your source now before you "forget" where you found it. I know from personal experience that it is much harder to find a source at a later date than it is to do so now, when you presuambly have the source if front of you. Best wishes. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 11:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 6 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Frank Jolly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queensferry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
A page you started (Charles Kingsley Meek) has been reviewed! edit
Thanks for creating Charles Kingsley Meek, Vietnamvat!
Wikipedia editor Matty.007 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Looks good. Are you planning on expansion of the article, the DNB has lots of info?
To reply, leave a comment on Matty.007's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
June 2014 edit
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bedford School may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- oupww/whowaswho/U163642/DOUBLEDAY_John_Gordon?index=1&results=QuicksearchResults&query=0}</ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:28, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Re: E H D Sewell edit
I'll add that task to my to-do list! Regards, Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 18:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Ways to improve Gerald Osborne Slade edit
Hi, I'm Kudpung. Vietnamvat, thanks for creating Gerald Osborne Slade!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thank you for your contribution. The page is displaying bare URLs, please consider correcting this. More information at WP:CITE.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:04, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
How to sign talk page posts edit
When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 13:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
August 2014 edit
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Bedford School does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.
The edit summary appears in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Chris Troutman (talk) 15:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Further to the post from Chris troutman above, please do not mark edits as minor when you are adding footnotes AND deleting maintenance templates. Edit summaries should be an accurate reflection of the edit you have performed. Flat Out let's discuss it 11:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Invitation to join MILHIST edit
Hello, Vietnamvat, you are hereby invited to join the Military history WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, theory, and practice. You can add your name to the list of members, browse our showcase, train at the Academy, weigh in at current discussions, read the news, or find an open task. We hope you will join us! Anotherclown (talk) 22:42, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Where did you get the 29 September 1971 birthdate for John Moule? The Debrett's source gives his birthdate as 29 May 1971 and I'm unable to access the other source. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- From Who's Who, which states: MOULE, John Stuart, Born Shrewsbury, 29 Sept. 1971. I'd noticed the disparity, but would treat Who's Who as a more reliable source than Debrett's,
A page you started (Francis Glanville) has been reviewed! edit
Thanks for creating Francis Glanville, Vietnamvat!
Wikipedia editor Fimatic just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Awesome biography! You included the infobox, categories, links, filling out the persondata template completely, and wrote a great biography on top of that! I guess it will save work from other editors categorizing/linking/etc. ;)
To reply, leave a comment on Fimatic's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, Vietnamvat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Benjamin Lyster-Binns for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Lyster-Binns until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of John Moule for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Moule until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Nomination of Sidney Miller (headmaster) for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidney Miller (headmaster) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.