VendixDM

Speedy deletion nomination of 2018 Riyadh missile strike

Hello VendixDM,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2018 Riyadh missile strike for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:37, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2018 Riyadh missile strike

Hello VendixDM,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2018 Riyadh missile strike for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:43, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2018 Riyadh missile strike

Hello VendixDM,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 2018 Riyadh missile strike for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:05, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at 1953 Iranian coup d'état. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 01:14, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

And stop calling editors who disagree with you vandals [1]. That's not vandalism. Acroterion (talk) 18:13, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

It was vandalism because it is a well established fact that Miles Copeland played a leading role in the coup:

Miles Copeland, who was dispatched to Iran by Roosevelt to make a logistical survey in preparation for the coup, sheds further light. Having arrived in Tehran, Copeland discovered that CIA operatives had already charted the routes that the demonstrating hordes would have to take, and pinpointed the targets that anyone organising a coup would (...) (page 116, Covert Action in the Cold War: US Policy, Intelligence and CIA Operations)

VendixDM (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

ARBPIA DS Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Please note editorsnwho are not extended confirmed may not edit Arab-Israeli conflict articles.Icewhiz (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

1953 Iran coup commanders list

Please feel free to comment at Talk:1953_Iranian_coup_d'état#RfC_about_the_list_of_commanders_in_the_infobox. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 00:04, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

WP:AE

I reported you for edit-warring in articles you are not allowed to edit per ARBPIA 30/500--יניב הורון (talk) 04:45, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018

To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating WP:ARBPIA3, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:49, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

The following will result in much longer blocks after this one expires:

• Editing content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict before you account is 30 days old and has 500 edits unrelated to the conflict.
• Calling other editors' edits vandalism. Please read WP:NOTVAND.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:08, 8 April 2018 (UTC)