User talk:Vanished user 90345uifj983j4toi234k/Archives 5–6

The following messages were sent to me in the past by other users. Please do not modify them.

Revert of "test" edit

Why do you revert a perfectly sensible revision, terming it a "test"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Windows_Genuine_Advantage&diff=55125355&oldid=55125281 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.176.192.72 (talkcontribs)

I have answered on his talk page. — Brendenhull 10:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your RFA edit

Do not overwrite your old RFA. I've created a new RFA page for you. NSLE (T+C) at 02:45 UTC (2006-05-27)

PS the message at the top of this page is disruptive, so I'd advise you to either remove it, or make minor changes (like spelling) so busy admins won't waste their time clicking it. NSLE (T+C) at 02:46 UTC (2006-05-27)

Hello Brendenhull : - ) I left you a question on your RFA. When you find the time could you look at it? thanks, FloNight talk 03:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

With the deterioration of your RFA, strongly reccomend withdrawal. NSLE (T+C) at 07:18 UTC (2006-05-27)

(Untitled) edit

Recently, I edited the List of kyokushin techniques when I was at school. I had created the article the day before, and continued on it during class. Yeah, I know I wasn't logged in, I totally forgot that. Anyways, you reverted the article I expanded, and I really would appreciate if you didn't do that again.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baardie (talkcontribs)

Answered on talk page. — Brendenhull 13:16, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! edit

Thank you for the wonderful and helpful article links you sent me and for welcoming me! Mollymoon 02:45, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

revert on Rolle's theorem edit

Hi Brendenhull,

I see that you have recently reverted a change made by an anonymous user from IP 82.46.18.102 in the article Rolle's theorem, and wonder why, as the change the anonymous user made was actually mathematically correct: the function f(x)=|x| really is non-differentiable at x=0 ... and the original version that he changed was arguably less precise. I might be wrong, but I think you may have been unduly harsh here?! Madmath789 21:42, 1 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank You for welcoming me edit

Thanks for sending me the friendly message! How do you make your one letter red? It is so cool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pillar of Cheese (talkcontribs)

Ten Cent Beer Night edit

The phrase "A father and son came onto the field in the 5th inning and "mooned" the crowd" should not have been removed. It actually happened. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.146.109.42 (talkcontribs)

pirate bay edit

I do apologise. I did mean to discuss my deletion but I got distracted right after. In retrospect it probably wasn't a good idea to go ahead without. As for the deletion, it seems kind of strange to mention a given website's lack of adult content and to follow with a convenient link to a site where you can find plenty of pornography. That it's part of the pirate bay 'extended network' seems fairly tenuous. I'm no prude but it comes across as opportunistic advertising and cheapens the article in my opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.108.30.175 (talkcontribs)

United States article on featured candidate nominations list edit

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/United States

Cast your vote! The more responses, the more chances the article will improve and maybe pass the nomination.--Ryz05 t 00:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

your vote in my RFA edit

Umm... What is wrong with science? ILovePlankton 01:06, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

{{Smile}}

--Bhadani 07:59, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Actually information removed is wrong. No information is suitable to replace the wrong information. So I correct it by removing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.102.159.232 (talkcontribs)

WW2 edit

Hi. I did revert some text. and got your capitalization too. I was goibng to put yours back, but then again, they do usually refer to WW2 as "the War". You can double check this on Google. However, if you think you are correct, this is OK too, and I will leave things as they are. I mainly wanted to get back the pictures. Wallie 17:17, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

My RFA edit

 
Thanks
Vanished user 90345uifj983j4toi234k/Archives 5–6, thank you for participating in my RfA. It passed with an amazingly unopposed 77/0/1. Thanks for the support everybody! If you see me doing anything wrong, want to ask me something, or just want to yell in my general direction, leave me a note on my talk page. I promise to try and knock out Wikipedia's problems wherever I may find them!

Staxringold talkcontribs 21:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

thanks edit

Hey there edit

Thanks for commenting on my RfA...it was greatly appreciated! --Osbus 21:48, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank You edit

 Thank you for supporting my Request for Adminship! I appreciate it and will do my best to maintain the faith you have shown in me! – Ben W Bell talk 07:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the welcome edit

I created my login and "wham" - I was welcomed. Thank you. As I indicated on my user page, I don't have a lot of time to contribute, but I thought that if I did make comments on discussion pages it was more useful to have a consistent signature than just an IP address. One day when I'm not so busy I'll put some edits into some of the articles that I see are a bit sparse.Peashy 11:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! edit

Hey Brendenhull , thanks for supporting my request for adminship! Unfortunately, it ended with a final tally of 5/17/3. Thanks again! Underneath-it-All 17:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Welcome message edit

Thanks for the welcome msg, but I was planning to put a notice there to redirect all comments to my Commons user talk. I certainly didn't expect an edit conflict as soon as I created an account!

Cheerio, Yaddah 11:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The above messages were sent to me in the past by other users. Please do not modify them.