Speedy deletion of Hot Shot (insecticide)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Hot Shot (insecticide) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster (talk) 16:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your rollback request

edit

Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/October 2008#Vandalismterminator. SoxBot X (talk) 19:00, 5 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

October 2008

edit

I reverted your revert, because my edit to my own comment was not vandalism. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 16:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are the subject of a sockpuppet investigation

edit

See here. Immunize (talk) 18:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC)Reply