Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (February 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Vadam24, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:09, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (February 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 12:54, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (February 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lakun.patra was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lakun.patra (talk) 19:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (February 25) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 00:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (March 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wiae /tlk 19:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (March 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Insertcleverphrasehere was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
InsertCleverPhraseHere 09:49, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (March 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Insertcleverphrasehere was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
InsertCleverPhraseHere 21:08, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (March 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Insertcleverphrasehere was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
InsertCleverPhraseHere 11:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (March 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:11, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (March 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 04:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (March 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 12:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (April 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 3 April edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (April 4) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
333-blue 03:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (April 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
333-blue 00:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (April 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
333-blue 23:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (April 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bradv 21:30, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (May 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wiae /tlk 04:38, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Africa facts zone edit

 

A tag has been placed on Africa facts zone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 11:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Africa facts zone (May 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lakun.patra was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lakun.patra (talk) 07:27, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isima Odeh (June 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ringbang (talk) 17:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

About Draft:Isima Odeh edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some of the previous decline notifications from the draft Draft:Isima Odeh. Please leave those previous decline messages on the page; they're helpful for future reviewers so they can see how you've improved the draft since the last review. When you've made all the changes requested, you can resubmit the draft, as I see you've done. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 21:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Isima Odeh edit

  Draft:Isima Odeh, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Isima Odeh and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Isima Odeh during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 21:34, 6 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article wasn't edited to be resubmitted, I edited it because I intended to add more sources and further make the article more understandable. I'm so sorry for any violation.

Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I've blocked you indefinitely for your refusal to listen to everyone at Draft:Isima Odeh. For example, instead of spending a second working on the draft, literally five minutes after the last rejection, you just submitted it again with no effort to find more sources. This isn't a game where you just resubmitted it repeatedly until people tire of your antics. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Vadam24, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Vadam24, I see that you have encountered little but biting since your arrival. That is unfortunate. Sorry.
I suggest that you read the links in the welcome message above, and then continue here by participating in conversation. Wikipedia editors are people, and conversation is how we do things. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Vadam24 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #15942 was submitted on Jun 11, 2016 01:19:54. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 01:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Vadam24 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #15953 was submitted on Jun 12, 2016 14:36:20. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 14:36, 12 June 2016 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Vadam24 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #16018 was submitted on Jun 21, 2016 12:22:43. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Vadam24 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #16044 was submitted on Jun 27, 2016 22:38:07. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 22:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Africa facts zone edit

 

Hello, Vadam24. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Africa facts zone".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Zupotachyon Ping me (talkcontribs) 03:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply