Your submission at Articles for creation: MV Doulos Hope (September 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, VR-HKG! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 11:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:MV Doulos Hope has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:MV Doulos Hope. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:27, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: MV Doulos Hope has been accepted edit

 
MV Doulos Hope, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:28, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2023 edit

  Hello. Your recent edit to List of coffeehouse chains appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 01:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Seems a bit daft that we're allowing "chains" on that list with as little as two locations but a well-cited chain with 500+ locations is removed, but OK. I don't have time to make a page from scratch right now so I guess we'll leave the list as less accurate than it should be. VR-HKG (talk) 03:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply