Greetings. Please post comments below.

Talk:Anal sex#Female to male (pegging) edit

Hey again, Tyranny Sue. I know we got off to a rocky start before, in the discussion above on your talk page, but I just wanted to let you know that I am for your section on pegging...as long as it grows bigger than what it is now. I stated more in the above linked discussion on it.

As for the main image of the Anal sex article -- of heterosexual anal sex -- that is due to needing a main image (paintings have been preferred on the talk pages), not waning a gay male image first...as to further the misconception that all gay men have anal sex or that anal sex applies more to gay men, and due to research suggesting that heterosexual couples may have more anal sex than gay men. Flyer22 (talk) 17:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I like the new main image you chose; it was already in the article before and works well for the lead. Also, I explained on my talk page about what I meant regarding the Pegging section. Flyer22 (talk) 03:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! This new image is actually one I cropped from a bigger one, so this version should be more relevant to the article, I hope. Do you remember why it was removed before?--TyrS 05:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Your input needed at CHU/S edit

I've left a comment on your request, and if the request is to proceed at all, your input will be needed. Thanks, dmz 06:09, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

my signature edit

what the hell is going on with it?-- TyrS  blah  08:23, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Tyranny Sue. You have new messages at Demize's talk page.
Message added 12:13, 12 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter edit

 

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Volume I, Issue III
February 2012

To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page.
ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.


ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Tyranny Sue. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply