Thank you for adding the description to Image:Guruvayoorappan.png. Rl 06:31, 13 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Human edit

Hello, I found your name at wikiproject:hinduism, and was hoping you might join us at talk:human, where things have become rather unbalanced and unrepresentitive of humanity as a whole. Hope your interested, Sam Spade 17:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

Greetings, the holi-hangover continues! --Bhadani 07:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

IRC for India: #wikipedia-in edit

Please join this channel for India-related discussions. In case you need help to access IRC, please visit my IndianIRC page. --Andy123(talk) 22:38, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

User:D.vamshii edit

You should probably leave your messages on his user talk page instead of his user page! :-) FreplySpang (talk) 04:11, 4 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's an easy mistake to make. Cheers, FreplySpang (talk) 04:13, 4 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Malayalam Edition edit

മലയാളം വായിക്കാനും എഴുതാനുമറിയുന്ന മലയാളിയാണെന്നു പ്രതീക്ഷിച്ച് താങ്കളെ വിക്കിപീഡിയയുടെ മലയാളം പതിപ്പിലേക്ക് ക്ഷണിക്കുന്നു. ഇടയ്ക്ക് അവിടെയും വന്നെത്തുക. നന്ദി. Manjithkaini 15:53, 2 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Quiz edit

Try to participate here also. Its just an experiment to attract more Keralites to the wiki culture. The link is here [1]Manjithkaini 17:56, 5 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello edit

I thought I'd drop in with a hello and hand you a bunch of interesting links:

Links for Wikipedians interested in India content

Welcome kit

Register

Network

Contribute content


I'm from Kerala too. See you around. -- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu_Joseph |TALK 06:53, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Mal Wiki edit

Thanks! But I'm already there. Not very active there yet. Will be, when my exams get over. -- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu_Joseph |TALK 12:24, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Matha.png edit

You recently uploaded this image to the commons: but stating en.wp is a source is not good enough. You haven't explained why it is GFDL here. What is the source? Who created it? pfctdayelise (translate?) 04:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

You can upload it locally to that project, but I don't know if they accept fair use or not either. pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

hi the image is actually own by me, what tag should i use for that thankS?

Hello! Can you please add Wikipedia talk:Notice board for India-related topics/Kerala to your watchlist, so that you don't miss out on the Kerala related discussions? Thanks! -- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK10:17, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Pradip Somasundaran edit

This is a message to all Category:Kerala Wikipedians

I want your opinion on this particular person Pradip Somasundaran. He claims to be a famous singer in Kerala. Now being a Malayalee, I have not heard of this person before, so I wonder whether or not you have heard of him before and set this issue straight. If so, then please let your opinion be counted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradip Somasundaran. Please note that by voicing your opinion as a Malayalee/Keralite will add more weight to your words.

Many Thanks --Ageo020 21:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Kumaranalloor Mani edit

An editor has nominated the article Kumaranalloor Mani for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kumaranalloor Mani. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Kumaranalloor Mani during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. - CobaltBlueTony 17:45, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

dubai il... edit

ദുബൈഇല്‍ സത്‌വയില്‍ താമസം.. ജൊലി സ്ഥലം ഷെയ്ഖ് സായെദ് റോഡിലാണ്.. കരാമ, ദൈരയില്‍ ഒക്കെ എപ്പോഴും വരാറുണ്ട്.. നമുക്ക് ഒരു ദുബൈ വിക്കി കൂട്ടായ്മ ഒപ്പിച്ചാലോ? പെരിങ്ങോടന്റെ അടുത്തും പറയാം :-)

195.212.29.92 16:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)simynazarethReply

Raja Yoga controversy edit

Dear Hinduism Project editors,

There is a controversy on the Hinduism regarding Raja Yoga. Please read the debate on the Hinduism discussion page. Your comments are requested on the Hinduism discussion page to help resolve the controversy. Thank you. HeBhagawan 14:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

M.dam edit

Hope you are talking about the image in Mal. wiki .The original Image of Mullaperiyar dam at the English wiki had {{PD-self}} tag. As i had edited it, i did not know what copyright tag to be put hence i gave a link to the engilish wiki(seems you did not see the link in the image page). so could you create/suggest a appropriate coppyright tag.activevoid (talk) 05:27, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

i too would like to contribute in malayalam by translating from english wiki etc. but i found it very hard to type in malayalam. can you tell me easy wayout. i was surprised to see that malayalam wiki has less articles than that of even manipuri!

Image source problem with Image:Balagokulam.png edit

 
Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Balagokulam.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 11:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Keralaseal.gif edit

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Keralaseal.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LaraLove 13:59, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Template:Ml Welcome edit

A tag has been placed on Template:Ml Welcome requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Template:User keralite edit

A tag has been placed on Template:User keralite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2008 edit

Institute of Human Resources Development edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Institute of Human Resources Development, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Institute of Human Resources Development. OlenWhitakertalk to me or don't • ♣ 22:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC) 22:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of Image:Thaali.png edit

 

A tag has been placed on Image:Thaali.png, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Thaali.png|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 05:48, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Velakali-ritual-art-kerala.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Velakali-ritual-art-kerala.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 20:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Guruvayoorappan.png edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Guruvayoorappan.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 20:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Mohiniyattam.png edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Mohiniyattam.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 20:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Kesavamenon.png edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Kesavamenon.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 20:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Hedgewar.png edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Hedgewar.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 20:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with Image:Golwalkar.png edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Golwalkar.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:28, 13 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 20:28, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply