Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello Ttau, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

Please read WP:YFA if you have not done so already. Welcome!! --Gurubrahma 11:27, 24 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Fenwick & West edit

Fenwick & West has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this is more of an advertisement than an encyclopedia article. Please review WP:CORP for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the prod notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. NickelShoe 16:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hastings professor bios edit

Hi. I've noticed that you've posted a number of bios for law professors that appear to be copied and pasted from the Hastings website. Unfortunately, this may be a copyright violation, and these pages may need to be removed - if you can either provide documentation that you have permission to use this information (which the school might be willing to provide) or sufficiently rewrite these articles so that they aren't infringing on the school's copyright, that would be great. See WP:COPYREQ for more information, and feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any further questions. Thanks! Perel 08:09, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Hastings site does say at the bottom

 © 2006 Hastings College of the Law, 200 McAllister St. San Francisco, CA 94102

and we are bound by that. If you could rewrite them that would be great - your contributions are much appreciated, we just have to keep everything legal. Perel 08:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello Ttau. Please be aware that all copyright matters are taken seriously, and that these articles are in the process of being deleted. As Perel has mentioned, we welcome your contributions, so long as they are your contributions and not copied from somewhere else. Feel free to contact me as well if you have any questions. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
The following copyvios have been deleted:
Before you spend your spend time recreating these articles in your own words, you may want to review our relevant guidelines for the inclusion of professors and academics in general at Wikipedia:Notability (academics). If there are any other copyright violations remaining, please contact me immediately via email or on my talk page and I will remove those as well. Thanks, Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:37, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


A tag has been placed on Free Food For Millionaires, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This article does not assert the notability of this book.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 01:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Free Food For Millionaires edit

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Free Food For Millionaires, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Realkyhick 05:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

July 2007 edit

  Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Zabuza Momochi on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 06:40, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of MacPherson Kwok Chen & Heid edit

 

A tag has been placed on MacPherson Kwok Chen & Heid, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. — Coren (talk) 01:29, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Attack edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on this page, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because the article is a page created primarily to disparage its subject or a biography of a living person that is controversial in tone and unsourced, where there is no neutral point of view version in the history to revert to. (CSD G10).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting the article, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate the article itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Ttau! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Garon Tsuchiya - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Roger Park - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Fenwick & West edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fenwick & West requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Epeefleche (talk) 23:18, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Adam Wasserman edit

 

The article Adam Wasserman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't establish that he meets WP:Notability (people)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:37, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Irving Kayton edit

 

The article Irving Kayton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is the best source, and it's not a profile of him. BEFORE shows no significant, in depth coverage or information to indicate he's a notable academic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarM 16:42, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Otto Lee edit

 

The article Otto Lee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local politician of minor importance, whose career and coverage do not rise to any level of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 18:58, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply