signed up to be able to signTrink24 (talk) 22:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[User:Trink24]Reply

July 2009 edit

A category you created, Category:Gate news items, has been marked for possible deletion. Please see the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 July 30#Category:Gate news items. Wasted Time R (talk) 11:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

What was placed there... as of July 30 11:38 edit

Category:Gate news items edit

Category:Gate news items (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. The category is confusingly named and is written more like an article. As such it is duplicative of the long-existing List of scandals with "-gate" suffix article. And the "-gate" practice is better handled with a list than a category, since in many cases the "-gate" form is not the primary means by which a scandal or controversy is known. Wasted Time R (talk) 11:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Article 28 - Medical Billing edit

 

The article Article 28 - Medical Billing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTMANUAL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Victão Lopes I hear you... 23:41, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

MicroBilt edit

Hello Trink -- The press piece you are looking for is the one in Fortune or Wired or WSJ that's called Scrappy MicroBilt in the ring with Three Goliaths. I don't know if you are going to find it. Rhadow (talk) 00:47, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply