Your message edit

"I was just reading curtis discussion, sorry man but gotta agree with the unknown guy, he had a point there when he said you aint all that trying 2 act like you know everything. Just remember where you started asa beginner its only a page, your not going ot win a nobel prize or anything for best article on wikipedia."

I take care of the article and make sure no one adds uncited material or vandalizes it. If I won't do it, someone else will. I never acted like I know everything, I just tried to make sure no one does anything until the discussion is resolved. If I made you think I am trying to control the article, then I am sorry, because I did not mean to. By the way, I don't think I'm "all that trying to act like I know everything". However, I do know more than a new editor, so I should at least try to teach them how to edit Wikipedia, what is acceptable, what is not. Once again, sorry if I was acting rude to you. Happy editing. --- Efil4tselaer: Resurrected 19:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Curtis (50 Cent album) edit

Right, thank you for your comment on my talk page, I am really trying my best to make sure nothing uncited gets added to the "Curtis (50 Cent album)" article. Right now though, I think no one really knows that much about the album, the only thing I know is what I see on the Internet, so yeah. --- Efil4tselaer: Resurrected 16:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

 Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 203.48.199.17 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Chaser - T 06:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Michael Jackson album edit

I have actually dealt with this before. The problem is that the source you gave is pretty much the only one that says that Jackson's upcoming album will be titled "7EVEN." No other media outlets have reported that information and I believe Jackson's representatives haven't said anything on it either. Same for Jackson himself. It's speculative at best and does not belong in Wikipedia at this moment. The most appropriate course of action would be to wait for official confirmation (ie. a statement from Jackson).UberCryxic 03:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ne-Yo edit

In regards to your question, most of Ne-Yo's unreleased material is on http://www.imeem.com/ and LimeWire. I'll be uploading most of it onto imeem, and I'll send you my account so you can download it. It might not be downloadable, but I'll see what I can do for ya. Mickel

Leak edit

Curtis Leak WHERE Secondandonly 00:08, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Curtis clean leak edit

No, it is not notable and does not need to be included or announced. See Graduation, the full retail album has been leaked and nothing is included, no need. Also please sign your comments using the tenth button at the top of your edit box. --Ayoleftyz 04:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Kanye West vocals on "Roc Boys" edit

Yes, he has small background vocals but we don't know if he is credited for it or not since the album hasn't been released yet. So until then, I guess I can make a note of it in the single article but that's it. --Ayoleftyz 00:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Done. --Ayoleftyz 00:47, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Joe & Wayne edit

I wouldn't know, they've kept it kind of discreet. Haven't heard of any more beefin. - NJ Rock —Preceding comment was added at 03:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Usher edit

LoL, I got 'cha!--FSX-2007 08:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: Lil wayne. edit

Yes, I have read the article. I think that it should be confirmed by multiple sources before deleting the article. One source is not enough for that. Mind you, Lil Wayne spoke about The Leak so it should be released, if not confirmed by multiple sources that it's been cancelled. Daniil Maslyuk (talk) 04:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of El Duo Dinámico edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, El Duo Dinámico, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Duo Dinámico. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 13:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Tha Carter III: The Leak edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Tha Carter III: The Leak, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tha Carter III: The Leak. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

In My Ghetto edit

Stop it. This is an album and you can't deny it. Rappingwonders2 (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Trimy67 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I normally edit wikipedia daily and i have contributed to a fair amount of articles in the past few days. I would love to continue to edit today? I find it a bit unfair that i have to suffer just because of someone elses stupid ways.

Decline reason:

reason — You were not directly blocked, you need to use the unblock-auto template, you're caught in an auto block of an IP, it appears. RlevseTalk 22:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 203.48.199.17 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Revolving Bugbear 23:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

trimy67 edit

UR GAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.119.189.160 (talk) 06:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply