Speedy deletion of Basudeb Dasgupta edit

 

A tag has been placed on Basudeb Dasgupta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. roleplayer 01:44, 4 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

The editor is unaware of the importance of the Hungryalist movement in Bengali literature in world perspective. Each participant of the movement is as important as the members of the Surrealist movement who individually deserve a page in Wikipedia. M Phil and PhD researchers are searching for these information but are unable to find something to depend upon. Wiki editors should keep in mind this aspect while the consider deletion. There are only a few living members of this movement from whom information is being gathered. Once they are dead it would be impossible to collate information about them. We have a feeling that the wiki editors are not conversant with Bengali literature and the link between the Hungryalists and the Western writers of that period. All sources and references are being included in a separate paragraph so that academicians who visit India are able to gather information as quickly as possible. Tridib Mitra (talk) 00:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Tridib Mitra.Reply


Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Tridib Mitra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -Thanks. Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 06:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of "ফালগুনী রায়" edit

 

A page you created, ফালগুনী রায়, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is in a foreign language and exists on another Wikimedia project.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 02:15, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Edits to Tridib Mitra edit

  If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Tridib Mitra, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --Ragib (talk) 00:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


September 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hungry generation, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not add comments like "Someone calling himself Maharshi Balmiki has vandalized this page; has removed photographs" to Wikipedia articles - if you want to document what you do, or what others do, please use the Talk page -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:07, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hungry generation, you may be blocked from editing. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hungry generation, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:20, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

This really is your last warning. If you have a content dispute with another editor, discuss it on the Talk page - DO NOT keep adding derogatory comments about the editor to the article itself! -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:22, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru (talk) 15:19, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply


ANI incident report edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply