TriadicRelation98

Welcome!

Hello, Kamalthebest, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 10:37, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Capital punishment global map

Hi Kamalthebest, thanks for taking my suggestion about the global map for the capital punishment page. I appreciated it. Welcome to Wikipedia, by the way! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 19:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! Kamalthebest (talk) 06:01, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Republic of Macedonia

Hello Kamal,

The section "Religion" of the article "Republic of Macedonia" was updated. In addition, some sources for the information were added. User "23 editor" doesn`t want to accept the facts and this user undid the revision. Do you know what we could do in this matter?

Best regards,

Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.1.57.19 (talk) 10:41, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello! I have added that new data back to that paragraph on the Republic of Macedonia page. l hope it can stay this time. Kamalthebest (talk) 06:01, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello Kamal,

Thank you very much. It seems that the user "23 editor" has accepted the facts. However, the user "Judist" doesn`t want to accept the facts and this user undid the revision on the article "Religion in the Republic of Macedonia". Maybe could you have a look and do you have some minutes to revise it? Thank you very much in advance.

Best regards,

Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.0.48.115 (talk) 20:59, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello Kamal,

User "Judist" doesn`t want to accept the facts regarding the religious affiliation in Macedonia. This user undid the revision on the articles Religion in the Republic of Macedonia as well as Republic of Macedonia.

Please have a look on the talk page of the article "Religion in the Republic of Macedonia". This is the link

Talk:Religion in the Republic of Macedonia

Kind Regards,

Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.78.132.143 (talk) 21:40, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry bro, not sure what to do now. Kamalthebest (talk) 20:33, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Women's march edits

Hi, I saw you edited the 2017 Women's March, and your addition was reverted as Point of View: "and especially at his statements and positions regarded as anti-women or in other ways reprehensible." This phrasing was in earlier versions of the article, and has undergone extensive editing. It has been added and reverted several times. I am moving it to Talk for discussion. Thanks for contributing.Bjhillis (talk) 23:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I can see where you're coming from. I have added "some" to the quote to distinguish between some who may not have seen Trump's statements as sexist. Kamalthebest (talk) 23:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Hey

Hey how are you, just a small note Muslims are not an ethnic groups, they are religious group compare them with Azerbaijanis, Indian people, Moroccans, etc is wrong. Have a nice day.--Jobas (talk) 08:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

@Jobas: Hello! I am aware that Muslims are not an ethnic group. I was trying to say that other pages about different groups of people have way more than 10 listed countries for the "Regions with significant populations" section. The only other pages for religious groups with similar infoboxes are "Jews" and "Christians" since "Hindus," "Buddhists," "Atheists," etc. don't have infoboxes, so I don't think that's the best barometer for the perfect infobox since there are only two examples. That's why I referred to ethnic groups and nationalities of which there are a variety of examples. And, all of them such Azerbaijanis, Indian people, Moroccans in addition to Pakistanis, Japanese people, and British people list more than 10 examples of "Regions with significant populations." That is why I believe we should list more than 10 examples of "Regions with significant populations" for Muslims even if they are not an ethnic group.

Office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Office of Victims of Immigration Crime Engagement, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Note that making a Reductio ad Hitlerum argument, as you have now repeatedly done on this page requires sterling sources, not partisan blogs and unreliable online "news" sites. When material has been reverted with an edit note reading "see talk" you need ot justify your edit on the talk page and get consensus before replacing contentious, highly POV material. And such material should never be reverted, as you did, with an edit note asserting that you "Undid vandalism WP:UNDUE"

Your revert

You reverted my edit on the page. The leader of the party said it was politically motivated, but that doesn't mean that it actually was. She's claiming something, that doesn't mean it was a terrorist incident. It's also unknown who did it. Police are treating it as a hate crime. There's nothing to say that it was politically motivated, ergo it can't be ruled as a terrorist incident. st170e 20:44, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

@St170e: I don't think the police need to call something a terrorist attack before we include it on the list. For example, the 2017 Paris machete attack is on the list despite police formally never explaining what the motive was. However, French President François Hollande and the American President Donald Trump stated that it was terrorism, so it's on there. The perpetrator was not even a member of a recognized terrorist group of ISIS, nor was he ever proven to be inspired by a recognized terrorist group. I feel like it's a similar situation where the incident was never actually considered to be terrorism by the police but an official stated that it was terrorism, so it was added. Kamalthebest (talk) 21:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Gender of Ms Sarah Welch

There are two clear indications of her gender. First, Ms. is an honoric used in English to precede the last name (family name) or full name of a female person. It is never used for males, because the equivalent honorific for males is Mr. Second, Sarah is a female given name. It is a very old female given name, being the name of the wife of Abraham, considered the founder of the Abrahamic religions, so that Sarah is considered an ancestor of the Jewish people and of others, including anyone tracing descent to Solomon. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:36, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Alright, that makes sense. Kamalthebest (talk) 03:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Talk page discussion

Hi Kamalthebest, I think you need to calm down. You are indeed clogging up the talk page discussion at Talk:Hindu, making a response to almost every comment by anybody. Please find other things to do in the meantime, and let the discussion proceed at its own pace. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

@Kautilya3: Almost every reply of mine was in reference to a comment directed towards me, but maybe I was too animated. Sorry, bro.

Respond

Hey how are you, If you see this source here p.22, you can see the most common languages among world Muslims population, among the 25 most common languages French and Russian do not appear, while it's true a large Muslim population do speak these two languages, yet it is not predominant spoken languages among Muslims compare to other languages, I think the information of this source could be added in predominant spoken languages among Christians or Hindu. Thanks and Have a nice day.--Jobas (talk) 14:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Ah, this is a great resource. Thanks, Jobas! Kamalthebest (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Persecution of Muslims in Myanmar into Islamophobic incidents. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice Diannaa! I was unaware of this procedure and will attribute copied material from now on. Kamalthebest (talk) 20:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

London terrorism

why take out the car ramming category, it was a car ramming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BernardZ (talk) 06:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

@BernardZ: I think you have the wrong person, sorry. The only edit I made to the 2017 Westminster attack was to add a map. Kamalthebest (talk) 06:33, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Oh, hold on, I see what you're referring to. I think I accidentally reverted something I didn't mean to. I'll fix it. Kamalthebest (talk) 06:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

No, I was right all along. This was the edit I made. It was just regarding the international reactions. I didn't touch the "see also" section, so I'm not sure who did that. I agree that Vehicle-ramming attack should be under the "see also" section. Kamalthebest (talk) 06:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

I found the edit you are talking about, and as you can see, it wasn't done by me. It was done by User:WWGB. Kamalthebest (talk) 06:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for my jumping to conclusions BernardZ (talk)

@BernardZ: No problem, dude! Kamalthebest (talk) 20:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Moving 1948 Anti-Jewish riots in Tripolitania

Hi. You need to use these instructions to propose moving a page when it can be potentially controversial: WP:RM#CM. Then we can have an "official" vote on the talk page. --Pudeo (talk) 02:02, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@Pudeo: Thank you, I will look into this. Kamalthebest (talk) 02:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

DS Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--Shrike (talk) 11:40, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of 2017 Transylvania University machete attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2017 Transylvania University machete attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Transylvania University machete attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 04:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Murder of Nabra

The murder of Nabra has been gaining a lot of international media coverage. This is in addition to it rocking the Muslims in North America and other countries. Do you think this could merit an article?VR _talk 14:01, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Vice regent: I was actually thinking of creating one, but for the sake of WP:PERSISTENCE, I think we should wait at least two more days to see if the story still has media attention. The fact that more recent investigation reports state the motive behind the murder was "road rage" rather than it being a hate crime might lower its significance to media sources. Then again, not all notable murders are hate crimes. See Murder of Travis Alexander for example. Kamalthebest (talk) 20:22, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Vice regent: It turns out somebody has created this article and you can contribute here: Murder of Nabra Hassanen. Kamalthebest (talk) 07:37, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for the thanks I thanked you back lol. Great to see a proud American :) - I plan to expand some of the Islamophobia articles too so see you around

ThePlane11 (talk) 02:51, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

@ThePlane11: That's great, welcome to Wikipedia! Kamalthebest (talk) 03:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kamalthebest. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2017 Portland train attack

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2017 Portland train attack you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2017 Portland train attack

The article 2017 Portland train attack you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2017 Portland train attack for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 12:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Islam in the United Kingdom

Hi there, it looks like you're not too active on Wikipedia lately, but I wanted to see if I could reach you regarding an edit you made to Islam in the United Kingdom last year. I've commented out a paragraph, with an explanation alongside it - see my edit here. If you can shed any light on the issue, I would appreciate it. Thank you! Jessicapierce (talk) 02:52, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello Jessicapierce! The statistics on breakdown of Sunni population by denomination are found in the footnotes at the bottom of page 59 of that report. Here's the direct quote, "Questions: (1) ‘What type of Sunni are you?’ with response categories: Salafi (N=38); Deobandi (N=31); Barelvi (N=45); just Sunni (N=508); all other (N=140)." The "N" denotes the number of respondents, which can divided by the total sample size of Sunni Muslims (N=762) to get a percentage. As for the last part of the sentence, it means that 18.3% Sunni Muslims (N=140) in the UK adhere to a school of thought that is not Barelvi, Salafist, Deobandi, or non-demonational. If you want to change it to word it better, I'm totally fine with that. LeRoiDesRois (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the clarification, I really appreciate it! I don't know how I missed those figures in the source - I thought I looked thoroughly, but I guess I didn't see that footnote. I will take a look at the article in a sec. Best, Jessicapierce (talk) 02:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LeRoiDesRois. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)