User talk:Toshio Yamaguchi/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Toshio Yamaguchi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bandai Namco Group, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jimmy Pitt talk 22:01, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Bandai Namco Group

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Bandai Namco Group. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Namco Bandai Holdings. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Namco Bandai Holdings - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Jimmy Pitt talk 22:01, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Having seen your subsequent edits and read your comments (to which I've replied) on the article's talk page, I've removed the csd tag. Regards Jimmy Pitt talk 09:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Bandai-namco.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Bandai-namco.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 08:57, 24 July 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 08:57, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Toshio Yamaguchi, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Toshio Yamaguchi/Namco Bandai Holdings. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

List of prime numbers

Nobody at Talk:List of prime numbers#Moving on time supported more than 500 which is the current number at List of prime numbers. I also think 500 is fine and would oppose more than 1000. There are links to much more at List of prime numbers#External links. It's easy to compute billions but we have to stop somewhere. I don't think Wikipedia is the right place for huge lists of computer generated numbers that can be recomputed faster than they can be downloaded. A page with primes in an interval of 10^7 can give page size problems and I recommend against trying to create it. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:59, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

• Agreed. Thank you.Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 02:21, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Significant error

"Primes of the form 10n+1. The only known case is 101."

What about 11? Or, for that matter, 2? DS (talk) 06:29, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

• Well, it is a matter of definition. In order to get 2, you must allow 0 as exponent, which is not a positive integer. If you allow only positive integers as exponent, then yes, you are right with 11 being a prime number of this form anyway. I must have overlooked that somehow. Maybe I considered only numbers "having at least one zero" between the two 1s. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 06:44, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

WebCiteBOT Replacement Task Force

Recently you expressed an interest in getting WebCiteBOT running again or replaced. WebCiteBOT was a bot that submitted links to WebCitation.org in order to combat WP:LINKROT. I have recently started a WebCiteBOT Replacement Task Force to help coordinate an effort to do just that. I am cordially inviting you to express your opinion on the matter if you are interested. Thanks. - Hydroxonium (H₃O⁺) 15:06, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Toshio Yamaguchi. You have new messages at Hydroxonium's talk page.
Message added 01:03, 4 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talk page box question

I added a little bit on helpdesk; if it doesn't make sense, or you have trouble, just drop a message on my talk. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  15:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm glad to see that working (ie User talk:Toshio Yamaguchi/Talk header). I think that is a better solution, because it keeps the header stuff out of the way. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  19:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: Linkrot discussion

Hello. You have a new message at Hydroxonium's talk page. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 10:35, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

I drafted a new RfC. Please take a look and spread the word. –SJ+ 20:58, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Pasteur Model.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Pasteur Model.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Template:Non-free book scan

Hi. I'm very uncomfortable with this template, which seems to me to be ripe for misuse. There are almost never going to be fair use allowances for scanning pages from books...unless you are critically discussing the actual presentation of the book. There's Template:Non-free fair use in for such situations (although I'm not entirely sure that the usage would clear a review at WP:NFCR). Given my great concerns that this template could be used under the belief that there is broad allowance for book scans on Wikipedia, I've nominated it for deletion at TfD. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 12:45, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Toshio Yamaguchi. You have new messages at Moonriddengirl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

WikiProject on primes

Regardless of whether you go forward with this or not, I thought you might want to see my userspace article User:CRGreathouse/Tables of special primes. CRGreathouse (t | c) 19:57, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

I like it. Maybe it should be discussed how much it overlaps with List of prime numbers. When will you move it into mainspace? Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

It was designed as an alternative to List of prime numbers. I discussed moving it to mainspace on WikiProject Mathematics some time ago and an editor objected. I haven't attempted since -- though maybe I should again some time. Right now I'm working on some template tech that would allow the tables to be sorted. CRGreathouse (t | c) 20:18, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

I would be happy to help with it. Once you think it is ready for mainspace, I would be glad to jump in and help improving it. I think it looks good. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 20:31, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Well let me get the template done, then, and clean a few things up. In the meantime, and ideas for (1) additional types of primes and (2) a name for the final article? CRGreathouse (t | c) 20:33, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

I already added some classes of prime numbers to List of prime numbers. Maybe you can check if you have all types listed there in your draft? As a name for the final article, I would prefer something like Classes of prime numbers or Types of prime numbers. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 20:40, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

I just looked at List of prime numbers and I have to say, it's even harder to navigate than when I was last there. There are some good ideas (probably your recent additions) that I might include, but there's also a lot of silly stuff. For example, it calls base-10 generalized Fermat numbers "Kulsha primes". (Better reference: [1] from which one can determine that the next term, if any, has more than 16,777,216 digits.)

Your suggestion on the name is good.

CRGreathouse (t | c) 00:45, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Automatic wikilinking to an articles AfD discussion

I've added a comment to Wikipedia:Help desk#Automatic wikilinking to an articles AfD discussion.  Chzz  ►  06:51, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Actor disambiguation

Thanks for the update. Don't worry. I'll move the existing article to another location if it is required and of course fix any links pointing to it. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:13, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Okay. :) Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 13:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Re:Sandbox clearing for pages in own userspace

I think I can do that. Except it would only clean whenever I'm on the computer. --43?9enter ^★_☭ 02:32, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Circular prime

Hi. I followed one of the links on your userpage to a discussion on this article. While I agree it is a nice article, I don't agree with the comments that it is complete. The article does not address publications, who first discovered them, or any relevant mathematical applications. It's not my field, but if you happened to have commented because it is one of yours, you might want to take another look and improve it. :) - 87.211.75.45 (talk) 08:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, another quick Google Books search already turned something up that might be worth including in the article. I think it might be difficult to find out who really first discovered them, because I think Circular primes have been known for a long time, but many people simple have never published anything. Also I guess many professional mathematicians might not be very interested in Circular primes and thus most of the research done might never result in anything that Wikipedia would consider as a reliable source or publication. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 12:07, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

It's just you an me -VS- linkrot

I've been watching Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Combatting linkrot and been saddened by the lack of response. I want to thank you for posting it though. It seems that people just don't care. I'm still thinking about how to move this forward and get people involved. Anyway, I just stopped by to thank you for your continued help with the linkrot issue. I'll let you know if I think of anything good. Thanks again. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 16:43, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

You're most welcome. It really seems to me that people just don't care. That's very sad, because I think a lot of much less serious problems receive a lot more attention. Part of the problem might be, that this is kind of an abstract issue. An article that is well referenced today appears to people as intact as long as the links are alive. They might think: "The article looks ok to me now, so why bother?" I'm unsure how to deal with that. If you have any ideas about this issue, you can always leave me a message and I will try to help as good as I can. Anyway, thanks for all the work you have already put into this. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 17:00, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I think you are correct and that people don't have experience with links going dead. They put a link in an article and then never check it again. But that's just a guess. Anyway, thanks again. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 17:07, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I just put up my new idea at Archived citations 2, but I still think we should have a WebCiteBot also. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 11:53, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Good comments. I hadn't thought about things that way. I'll have to think about this some more. Thanks for the input. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 23:43, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi Toshio, I just saw your comment at Δ's talk page. Δ's WebCiteBot is actually the solution I would prefer to the dead link problem, so I have asked him about it. I figured I should keep you in the loop, so I'm letting you know. Thanks. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 22:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

I am watching his talk page anyway and often closely look at the comments given there. Thanks for letting me know. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 22:40, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

So, what do you think?

I just finished adding in the math formulas you helped me with for Salter's duck. I think i'm done with the article for now. I'm gonna swing by DYK with it. Please let me know if I did something wrong with the formulas. Silverseren^C 10:36, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

I think the formulas look fine and the markup is ok now. I checked again with the source and all formulas seem to be the same as in the source. Good work. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 10:23, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. If I ever have any other formula issues, you'll be the first one I come to see. ^_^ Silverseren^C 10:36, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pasteur Model.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pasteur Model.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:34, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Toshio Yamaguchi. You have new messages at WP:VPR.
Message added 01:51, 10 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you

Thank you for advice on online citations at the helpdesk. I have tried to do what was stated on the website you suggested.

At last, I seem to be getting somewhere - I have tried my hand (taking your advice) on the article on Father Victor White. Thanks a million, ACEOREVIVED (talk) 14:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Further Thanks

Thank you again, ACEOREVIVED (talk) 14:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

It is good to see that I was able to help. Cheers. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 14:40, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Template deletion

Hi, I appreciate being informed if you nom any templates I have been working on, such as {{Confusing}}. Rgds, Rich Farmbrough, 00:28, 24 June 2011 (UTC).

First, I am sorry, I simply forgot that. Second, it is not that easy to identify a major contributor in case of that template. You are neither the creator of the template, nor do you seem to have an outstanding number of contributions to this template compared to the overall number of contributions by other editors. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 09:07, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

It's cool, just saying for the future, if it happens. Rich Farmbrough, 11:11, 24 June 2011 (UTC).

Me = sad

I just stopped by to say hi and I saw "Because of certain personal issues, Toshio Yamaguchi will not be on Wikipedia for an indefinite period of time." Now I am sad. I really appreciate everything you have done for the project, especially the help with archiving citations. I hope everything turns out OK and that you'll be back soon. Best wishes to you. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 05:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I have some stuff in my real life I need to care of first. I will try to check my talk page frequently, however, I think I will not participate in larger scale discussions or editing in the near future. Sometimes life simply leaves you no choice. Once the issues are resolved, I hope to get back to full scale editing again. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 13:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, Toshio. You have certainly put a lot of work in to this project and I appreciate it. But this project is just for fun and when real life calls, you need to care of that. I'll stop by occasionally just to say hi and make sure you are OK. Thanks again for all your hard work. Best wishes. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 01:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Waldemar Meissner

This is a follow-up to your recent inquiry on de:WP:UF. Further research by the German reference desk team finds there is a high probability, though no proof, that the author was Waldemar Meißner (1852–1928), father of Walther Meißner. He would have been 61 in 1913. Some have suggested that Walther may have helped his father... --Concord (talk) 02:11, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Concord. Regarding the uncertaincy of the actual copyright status, I will not make the work accessible online. Although there is some probability that the work is in the public domain, I would only scan and make it accessible online, if I knew for sure, that it is in the public domain. Maybe I will email the Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften in order to find out if someone there knows when Meissner died. Again thanks for the reply. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 13:06, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

WebCite archiving update

Hi Toshio. I hope you are doing well. I just wanted to keep you up to date on the Webcite archiving stuff. I ran across this bot discussion recently, which was very encouraging. But I'm not sure how this would work because I believe the bot operator still has this restriction in place on his original account. Anyway, I just wanted to let you know that people are still working on the archivng stuff. Best regards. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 03:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Hydroxonium. I will try to get in contact with User:Gwern and ask him, if his script at [2] is ready to be run on the English Wikipedia. If we could make this accessible on the toolserver or even integrate it into the toolbox, this would be the solution I would prefer. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 10:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

The Arbcom restriction doesn't apply here as the daemon in question would be purely read-only as far as Wikipedia is concerned - it just is fed (non-Wikipedia) URLs through a text file and does stuff with them. You could run it off a dump of the external links if you wanted.

The real problem is that WebCite chokes IPs to one URL per 20-30 seconds. Hence it would be utterly impossible to attack even a tiny subset of Wikipedia's URLs. (At one URL per 30 seconds, my local daemon can barely keep up with a heavily filtered list of personal URLs!) Unless you get permission and support from Gunther or whomever runs WebCite these days, and can archive URLs at a rate more like a couple hundred or thousand URLs per second, there's not much point in looking at my daemon. You would be better off compiling a list of URLs and asking WebCite to archive the list at its leisure (it was supposed to have this feature years ago...) --Gwern (contribs) 21:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

What about a possible whitelisting of your IP for high speed archiving? As far as I know, another user tried to get such a whitelisting, however I don't know if it has ever been granted to that user or how open WebCite generally would be to such a whitelisting of a single IP. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 01:27, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

One can ask. Previous emails to WebCite leaves me pessimistic about a reply or such a white-listing. In any event, I could not commit to archiving for Wikipedia, so someone else would have to run it - my own connection and personal situation don't allow for consistent long-term commitments to anything but my own personal projects. --Gwern (contribs) 02:40, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

@Toshio, Thanks for the help and stuff. I appreciate your continued support.

@Gwern, thanks for the input and your software efforts. They are much appreciated. I too, have been unable to get in touch with Gunther recently, but I will try again as he seemed very interested in working with us when he joined our discussion back in February. Thanks. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 02:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:USS Pasteur.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:USS Pasteur.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Discussion on VPR you may be interested in

Hey, I am seeking community input regarding a partnership with the Internet Archive on external links and thought you might be interested. It is available here. Thanks, --Kevin Brown (talk) 04:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Kevin. I replied at Village pump. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 10:57, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Prime classes

I had missed your comment two weeks ago. Thanks for the heads-up; I fixed the problem at User:CRGreathouse/Tables of special primes.

CRGreathouse (t | c) 02:47, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposal

Rcsprinter (talk) 16:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UniversityofLondonLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UniversityofLondonLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:19, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UofLondon logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UofLondon logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:UniversityofLondonLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UniversityofLondonLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:55, 26 July 2011 (UTC)