User talk:TopGun/Archives/2015/April
Latest comment: 9 years ago by TopGun in topic Indian Subcontinent
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thankyou so much for the welcome
Hi Topgun, Thankyou so much for the warm welcome. Appreciated. Hope you have a great time editing yourself. I have an important question. Would you mind clarifying a few things for me? Julliedon (talk) 06:08, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the invite
I would love to join WikiProject Pakistan i have added my name on the user list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ataurrehman.994 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Indian Subcontinent
Hi, Things written on your user page says that you support unification of Kashmir with Pakistan and you are talking about NPOV and removing UN maps. Strange!! Well, have good life. --Human3015 19:03, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Good observation, Human3015. Take a look at WP:POVEDITOR. Every one has a POV, and the one who denies it, is lying. And POV isn't a bad thing. we just don't want it in the articles. There are two ways to get rid of it; use a neutral perspective, or counter with opposite perspectives with appropriate weight. So even if I personally support reunification of Kashmir as a part of Pakistan, I do not push that POV in to the article and choose to go with the NPOV map or a UN map with the dispute demarcated. I hope you can do the same and follow WP:NPOV which is a core wikipedia policy. --lTopGunl (talk) 19:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I don't have any problem with current map but only thing is that it don't show location of Subcontinent in globe, all regional articles have same kind of "global" map. And I accept that their should not be dotted line around Pak administered Kashmir if Indian side don't have. And whatever you say, edits of editors do reflect their POV atleast in some extent. We have to reduce that personal POV. Nice to meet you and I hope same kind of neutral editing from you. Thank you. --Human3015 19:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Edits of editors should not reflect their personal POV... that's what NPOV is. Anyway, if you would like to edit that map and either include the dotted line for both sides or exclude for both, go ahead. But use the article's talk page for consensus either way. --lTopGunl (talk) 19:31, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I don't have any problem with current map but only thing is that it don't show location of Subcontinent in globe, all regional articles have same kind of "global" map. And I accept that their should not be dotted line around Pak administered Kashmir if Indian side don't have. And whatever you say, edits of editors do reflect their POV atleast in some extent. We have to reduce that personal POV. Nice to meet you and I hope same kind of neutral editing from you. Thank you. --Human3015 19:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)