Tonalone
Welcome edit
|
Thank you for the brief visit.--Tonalone (talk) 15:44, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello Tonalone: Regarding Malik Ayaz. Your edit removing the 'Anecdotes' section was justified because the section was ostensibly the work of a 'banned editor.' I saw no proof for that assertion. In fact the Anecdotes had been accruing for several years. If you want to edit this article, please have some legitimate reason. Thanks. 69.226.218.19 (talk) 06:48, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Banned users edit
I've noticed that you've been removing chunks of material from articles for several months, claiming it was added by some unnamed banned user. Please explain who this "banned user" is and how you know who they are. I find your edits really dubious. We are not obliged to remove edits by banned users but usually decide on a case-by-case basis - we certainly don't do it if it damages the articles because the articles are what we're all here for. If you continue edit warring and deleting material from articles without giving a damn good reason (and some vague "banned user" claim is not a good reason) you're the one who is going to be blocked for damaging articles. I've looked at the history of this page and I see this has been an issue since at least back in February when someone contacted you about the Szymanowski article. FYI, per the BAN policy, which allows editors in good standing to take responsibility for a banned user's reverted edits, I've restored that material to the page. Sarah 13:18, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Vocal technique.ogg edit
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vocal technique.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Rodhullandemu 01:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)