Thomas-pluralvonglas
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CoSpaces is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoSpaces until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 11:32, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the reminder. It looks like I need to add more references to the article. There are a lot of Blogs and news sites which have reported about CoSpaces. https://cospaces.io/pr.html And they have currently celebrated their 50.000 users https://twitter.com/cospaces_io/status/852157806681763841 having a growth of 12.000 new users a month. Will receive an award for Best App 2017 in June by the American Library Association. So it should be a valuable entry, right? Thomas-pluralvonglas (talk) 11:45, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hi. The appropriate place to object is the deletion discussion page (listed above) were people will actually read your objections. Also, before introducing blogs as sources, please read this article on reliable sources and this article on general notability. Good luck. Kleuske (talk) 11:52, 9 May 2017 (UTC)