Theoneyihistorian
Joined 22 August 2018
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Theoneyihistorian in topic Your claims about Yi Seok and Andrew Lee
Welcome! edit
Your claims about Yi Seok and Andrew Lee edit
From what I see of your previous edits, all claims of them two didn't appear until 2005, and the family association was founded in 1957 which is more reliable and it is the oldest. So I modified all the associated statements and what you made aren't suitable for Wikipedia.
Also: I have been making this edits for so long, not so-called "vandalism" "rewriting history" - and you just reverted them all. What a harsh accusation. - George6VI (talk) 16:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Please do not paste text like that into my talk page. Theoneyihistorian (talk) 23:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- User:George6VI I am happy to discuss the edits that you have made and why those edits are incorrect. Theoneyihistorian (talk) 04:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Also: An association founded in 1957 is hardly reliable as opposed to news sources. Theoneyihistorian (talk) 04:02, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- This is a family succession we are talking about, especially this clan has history for centuries. Is House of Yi a family founded not until 1957? No. Was Yi Seok the founder of the clan? Also no. All of Yi Seok being the leader of the clan is based on his words in 2005, which is challengeable because none of his claims can be publicly proven before the year. On the other side, the association is also widely recognized by the clan, and Yi Un as well his son Yi Ku in 1960s and 1970s in person. If Yi Seok were so legitimate, why didn't he claim it earlier in these dates? We all know how unreliable the Internet news can be, which needs to be verified by different sources, such as books and/or researches. - George6VI (talk) 05:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2006/10/22/features/Coronation-of-Koreas-new-empress-leads-to-royal-family-controversy/2831239.html I think this makes clear that there is controversial. I'm going to end our discuss here by adding a reference improvement tag. I think this is in line with your response about books and/or researches. Newspapers are references, but more will help us better understand. Theoneyihistorian (talk) 19:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Added reference tags across all controversial pages Theoneyihistorian (talk) 19:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- This is a family succession we are talking about, especially this clan has history for centuries. Is House of Yi a family founded not until 1957? No. Was Yi Seok the founder of the clan? Also no. All of Yi Seok being the leader of the clan is based on his words in 2005, which is challengeable because none of his claims can be publicly proven before the year. On the other side, the association is also widely recognized by the clan, and Yi Un as well his son Yi Ku in 1960s and 1970s in person. If Yi Seok were so legitimate, why didn't he claim it earlier in these dates? We all know how unreliable the Internet news can be, which needs to be verified by different sources, such as books and/or researches. - George6VI (talk) 05:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)