Thejax
Welcome to Wikipedia! edit
Dear Thejax: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:
- Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Community Portal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- How to edit a page
- How to revert to a previous version of a page
- Tutorial
- Copyrights
- Shortcuts
Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any dicussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 16:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
your recent edits edit
Thank you for experimenting with the page Freehold Raceway Mall on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 16:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Image:Freehold-legs.jpg listed for deletion edit
Image:Freehold-dress.jpg listed for deletion edit
Image copyright problem with Image:Exam-table.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Exam-table.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —chair lunch dinner™ talk 06:50, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Exam-dress.jpg edit
Thanks for uploading Image:Exam-dress.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —chair lunch dinner™ talk 06:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Response to comment edit
I have responded to your comment on my talk page. Click on talk (next to my name) to go there. —chair lunch dinner™ talk 13:54, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Under-dressed girls edit
While these comments may well be true, I think you're falling foul of the 'no original research' rule. To be considered valid on this site, you'd really need to provide a cite to an external source making the same claims: I've left the page alone for the time being, but until you can cite sources I suspect you'll see people reverting it on that basis. Mark Grant 16:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the nonsense article Deflowering Room. Your test worked, and has been or will soon be removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please also see Wikipedia:The perfect article to learn more about appropriate article creation. (aeropagitica) (talk) 21:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Image:Exam-dress.jpg listed for deletion edit
Image:Exam-table.jpg listed for deletion edit
Speedy delete tags edit
Do not remove speedy delete tags from articles. It is considered vandalism. If you believe the article has merit, and should not be deleted, add a "hang-on" tag to the article, and make your case on the article's talk page. Thank you. ---Charles 19:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
I only deleted it because you tagged it by coming to a conclusion without doing your homework.
---thejax
- Reply (copied from AFD discussion page): The additional links are helpful. I'd still feel better if you had a reliable source (like a newspaper article) that specifically discussed or defined what a "whacker" is. That said, it's your job, as the article creator, to make sure that the article is backed by verifiable sources. It's not other editors' responsibility to "call their local fire department" to verify an article. Finally, the article is no longer tagged for speedy deletion, so there's no need to repost the hangon tag. AFD discussions normally run for five days. If there are reputable news sources, that should be enough time to find them. NawlinWiki 20:47, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Your edits to User:NawlinWiki edit
User pages are for people to describe themselves. If you want to leave a message for someone, leave it on their Talk page, in this case User talk:NawlinWiki. If you put something on the User page, that person will not get the "You have new messages" note. Fan-1967 21:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:2645643140078862733zXrXTv ph.jpg listed for deletion edit
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2645643140078862733zXrXTv ph.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. - — pd_THOR | =/\= | 02:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Image:Superwhacker1.jpg listed for deletion edit
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Superwhacker1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you.
Image:Superwhacker2.jpg listed for deletion edit
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Superwhacker2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you.
Image:Whacker3.jpg listed for deletion edit
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Whacker3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you.
Image:Whacker4.jpg listed for deletion edit
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Whacker4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you.
Potty Pants edit
Welcome to Wikipedia! We could really use your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as "Potty pants") are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Mhking 03:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Blocked edit
You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Firsfron of Ronchester 07:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Request for Unblock by User edit
Thejax (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Another party used my login name without my consent
Decline reason:
Your account has been disruptive over a long period of time. -- HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 16:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Here is a copy of the E-Mail I sent to Firsfron of Ronchester regarding this matter.
....... Good Evening. I want to appoligize for the trouble. As you know, the christmas holiday is among us and I have young teenagers over my house playing on my computer. I was on Wikipedia earlier and left my name logged in. It seems I have been blocked by you indefinetly for what they have posted under my name. After what I read, I agree with why you responded the way you did. I also take responsibility for this because it was my negligence that left me name logged in, which lead to the issue of adding to the pages as you see here. I have found out about this after I was just woke from them telling me I was blocked. I obviously started yelling at them and so on. It is 3:00am here at the moment.
If you look at my past additions, I submit articles that other users may find unjustifiable so I try to justify it. These articles that were recently posted under my name are not my style at all. I would never just play around adding tags or putting up derogatory things about Wikipedia. As you notice, I have not done this in the past. I ask that you please remove this block. I have learned my lesson by leaving my computer on unattended and if you feel I should remain blocked, I can respect that. But I request that the block can be changed and will at least expire and not be indefinet. Though I take responsibility, I did not do this work and I feel I should be penalized indefinetly for something I would never do. Please respond when you get a chance. Again, I appoligize.
-- The Jax 03:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I've contacted the blocking admin for comment. In the meantime, please bear with us, and thanks for your patience. Luna Santin 10:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- I won't unblock. Even before this incident, this user's contributions are highly questionable. I note this was one of the user's first edits, reverted multiple times, and then later there was this. User's first contribution was a 4RR, followed by edits which were reverted as vandalism. User's remaining contributions consist of talk page complaints ("I didn't vandalize!") and then a string of vandalism and/or nonsense edits yesterday. These types of edits lead me to believe this user has no interest in building an encyclopedia. Firsfron of Ronchester 19:23, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Re: Unfabulous edit
I reverted your edits because the whole story seems a little bizarre and there wasn't a single source to support it. If you're planning to re-add it, please read Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research before you do. --Fritz S. (Talk) 10:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Unfabulous02.jpg edit
I noticed you simply copied the source/copyright information for Image:Unfabulous02.jpg from Image:Unfabulous 03.jpg. It's obviously a different image from a different source, so please provide the proper copyright/source information. --Fritz S. (Talk) 13:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
