User talk:The Mad Bomber/Archive1

Latest comment: 17 years ago by CambridgeBayWeather in topic Tha Undertaker

User:The Mad Bomber/Status

Messages

Archives
Archive #1, Before June 15th 2006

Guidelines for my talk page:
  • Be kind and civil at all times.
  • Unsigned messages may not be replied to.

Theringi's vandalism edit

You ought to post to the Adminnistrator's page where you can request a block. Trying to paste the page to here now. ForestH2

Here is the link. This is for Theringi.

Request an IP adress or user to be blocked on this page

—Preceding unsigned comment added by ForestH2 (talkcontribs)

Vancouver schools edit

Thanks for starting up some school articles. Here are some stubs and categories you might find helpful:

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Usgnus (talkcontribs)

My IP has been blocked without reason edit

Please unblock my IP 24.80.228.68

--The Mad Bomber (talk) 00:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

{{unblock}} You were blocked for the following reason- 24.80.228.68 on blacklist, added by User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me at 01:50:14 24-May-2006 UTC, "Autoblacklist: repeated vandalism for several days", Expires 04:50:14 27-Jun-2006 UTC

Did you not make edits under that IP? --Pilot|guy 00:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I did not!
--The Mad Bomber (talk) 03:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
I'm replying to your helpme; Sadly, the individuals on helpme patrol are not administrators, you'll have to wait for the official reply to your unblock request. -- Wirelain 04:12, 26 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
As above do not use the {{helpme}} tag for unblock requests, it doesn't get you unblocked any quicker and wastes the time of those who watch the helpme tags. I've removed the block now so you should be able to edit. --pgk(talk) 06:53, 26 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Lenny Kravitz edit

Hi TheMadBomber, cute name. I see that you added "Jewish-American" to Lenny's bio. I reverted it back since that isn't standard biographical formatting. His ethnicity should be discussed further into the article. Thanks! --Tom 21:35, 27 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re: Prussian Blue mp3 edit

If you'd checked the talk page, you'd have seen that I've had a message for you there for a long time regarding the mp3 which I removed, and which you recently reinserted, and which has been removed once again. Specifically, the mp3 does not have any material regarding Prussian Blue in it. The interview is between a DJ at KERN radio and an 11 year old girl named "Ellie Mae". While the mp3 does cover the topic of white nationalism and racism (as the little girl is obviously being coached by her parents on what to say). No one in the mp3 is identified as being one of the Gaedes, or even a fan of their music. Prussian Blue and the Gaedes are never mentioned in the mp3. The mp3 therefore does not support the claim that Prussian Blue are "just proud of their heritage". Cheers, Kasreyn 16:10, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove my header (shown below) from my talk page. edit

Thanks!

--The Mad Bomber (talk) 21:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Is that picture copy righted or does it belong to you? :) --Tom 22:53, 3 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tom the picture used in my header (shown below) is in the public domain. So I am free to use it on my talk page. edit

Image:Prince Albert Piercing.jpg

I appreciate your concern.

--The Mad Bomber (talk) 00:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

How does that picture have anything to do with discussion concerning Wikipedia? I think I am in violation of feeding the trolls so I am going to have to reign things in abit. --Tom 00:30, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your talk page edit

Dear Mad Bomber,

Your talk page violates WP:USER. The image on the page has nothing to do with Wikipedia and presumably serves to dissuade people from reading and using your talk page. If you do not remove it, I will list it at WP:MFD.

Please respond on my talk page, as I am not going to return to yours. -- Mwalcoff 03:14, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

You might be interested to read this discussion (begun by Mwalcoff) on the administrators' noticeboard. The emerging consensus seems to be that your usage of the image may not be de jure proscribed by WP:USER (and may not, to most of us, be at all unsettling or offensive) but that the image, rightly or wrongly, appears to be serving to disrupt (or, at the very least, to inhibit collegial collaboration) and that it might be decorous of you to remove it. Feel free, though, to interpret the debate differently... Joe 07:01, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The thing about the picture is that people do not expect to see it on a talk page. Therefor it shocks them. I am wondering why it is you want the picture on your talk page in the first place? It is certainly an unusual thing to do. I think you need to either remove it, or at least put some sort of explanation next to it to explain to people why you have such a picture on your talk page. To Mwalcoff this picture illustrate a wikipedia article - so it is not going to be deleteted. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 15:41, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the two duplicates from this page as it seems to me that they were just there to anger those feeling offended in the first place. Likewise placing vandalism templates on people's talk pages who remove the image also serves only to escalate the dispute rather than resolve it so please don't do that. Also don't insert the picture on other people's talk pages. if they are unhappy about you have the photo on your talk page then it must be obvious to you that they will not want you to put it on there's no will they? It is much better to actually talk to people rather than dismiss them. Cheers Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 15:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've fixed /header to remove the picture. In my opinion this is an absolutely crystal clear case of vandalism. Any similarly malicious edits will get you a block. --Tony Sidaway 16:10, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fine NSDAP wins edit

I have no desire to fight you fascist tyrrants anymore.

--The Mad Bomber (talk) 18:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Personal attacks edit

I have blocked you for one week for making a racist personal attack.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I think I should be unblocked. Usually when niggs call eachother niggs (like I did), it's not considered racist.
--The Mad Bomber (talk) 02:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tha Undertaker edit

While the page was a candidate to be deleted you should not blank the page but tag it. See Wikipedia:Speedy deletions and Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

I just like to say that thank you for removing the vanity page immediatly. You made my day when I saw it gone. -scotchMB