Album art edit

How do I obtain permission to use copyrighted album art in articles for albums? Does fair use apply here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Irate Communist (talkcontribs) 01:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

See WP:NFUR. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 01:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

(edit conflict)

Yes, that's the usual basis for album art. No permission required, but you have to fill out the NFC justification form in detail. Please see: WP:NFC. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 01:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Guidelines edit

Please take a look at some jazz guidelines by clicking on my name. Thanks.
Vmavanti (talk) 02:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Park Jefferson for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Park Jefferson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Park Jefferson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:04, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

article naming edit

Hi, you forgot to include User:The Irate Communist/ before the Sandbox:title drafts that you created earlier. I've moved them to your userspace. Schazjmd (talk) 16:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Time theft moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Time theft, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kaizenify (talk) 16:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Donna Pinciotti edit

Donna Pinciotti has been AFD. I am notifing you because you were the original tagger. Techie3 (talk) 11:40, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Trailer Park Boys into Michael Jackson (actor). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 11:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

-->

December 2022 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Ben Shapiro, you may be blocked from editing. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 01:04, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dude. It was just a test edit. I have not been active on this stupid site since December 2020. Let me shake off the rust, and then I will get back to editing. The Irate Communist (talk) 06:58, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

FYI edit

I am not the original owner of this account. My friend told me they were no longer a communist, and they gifted me this account. Now I'm just having a little bit of fun and games with it. The Irate Communist (talk) 07:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022 edit

 
Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If your account is locked, please contact ca wikimedia.org. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.Bilby (talk) 13:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is crap edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Irate Communist (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

How am I compromised? I'm not making edits for the Rothschilds am I?? This block is a complete load and honestly a mistrial. Cmon now, this is America. This account was a gift from my roommate because they don't use it and they aren't a Communist anymore. I am a motivational speaker and I did the Ben shapiro edit on an overhead projector infront of a large group of students. I'm sorry for that. I AM NOT COMPROMISED THOUGH AND I WILL NOT BE SILENCED

Decline reason:

You are stating that you are not the person who created this account. That means this is indeed a compromised account; see WP:COMPROMISED. Yamla (talk) 21:18, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This account isn't worth as much when it is blocked edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Irate Communist (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why the hell did I admit I am not the original owner of this account? This is a legendary account in my community. It was pawned off on me as a secret santa thing. But now people are offering me good money for the login info, but the account is worth nothing if its blocked. Please, make a special case for this. I am not compromised, I never make compromises

Decline reason:

No. Talk page access removed. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 06:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Irate Communist (talk) 04:56, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply