You think to lecture me about a neutral point of view when yours was so obviously biased? I beleive my comments are neutral while yours are merely a judgement on a long dead person. Moreover, did any of my changes to the article appear to show "self righteous tendancies"? A neutral point of view is a goal that may never be reached, but you seem to beleive that I unbalanced the article in some way. Where? Comment on the page if you can find my bias. Cyclonus0102 22:54, 30 November 2005 (UTC)