Welcome! edit

Hello, Akhiljaxxn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 08:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

MJ Fan edit

I see you are also a double Indian Super League/Michael Jackson fan lol... awesome! --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 01:51, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArsenalFan700 i'm not just a fan of michael jackson i'm a huge devotteee Of Him Akhiljaxxn (talk) 12:19, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Haha, same. Man is a god damn legend to me. If you check my spotify it is all MJ for the most part. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 17:36, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArsenalFan700 thats Great and spotify says Michael Jackson is the most streamed artist of 2016 in their ‘Soul’ Music Category. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 01:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yep, saw that and was so happy. I am more of a fan of his ballads if I am perfectly honest. Songs like Gone to Soon or Butterflies are beautiful. Im upset that the Dangerous 25 celebrations were pretty mediocre. Expected a lot more honestly. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 02:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yeah they r not gonna to release an D25.they only celebtatin the 25th annivsry on Online Akhiljaxxn (talk) 11:52, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Akhiljaxxn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Neverland Ranch edit

Hey,

I notice you reverted my edit here but I think you intended to remove the section altogether because you had an issue with sourcing. My edit was only to fix a style error so when you reverted you didn't actually remove the contested content, you just restored the style error. I have gone ahead and reverted it further to achieve what I believe was your desired result.

Thank! -- Dane talk 15:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of {{Persondata}} edit

Hi Akhiljaxxn,

I'm the bot who is deleting {{Persondata}}. I noticed your edit on Paris Jackson (actress) in which you added {{Persondata}}. This template is deprecated and deleted. Please stop adding {{Persondata}}. In case you want to support the Persondata project you can help with the migration of the dataset to Wikidata at KasparBot's tool. See Wikipedia:Persondata or contact my operator T.seppelt in case you have any questions.

Thank you very much, -- KasparBot (talk) 01:00, 4 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 22 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonathan Moffett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Like A Prayer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Michael Jackson into Sony Music. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please leave a message on my talk page if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:27, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Re: MJ cultural impact edit

Hmm, sure but I need to know how many other MJ editors would love to join in. BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 21:43, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

BrothaTimothy.i'm not sure how many of them will join us but the page is ready and hope you will expand and fix the errors Akhiljaxxn (talk) 06:00, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sure, I'll see what I can do tomorrow if I got time lol BrothaTimothy (talk · contribs) 08:55, 11 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

So are we sure that article is notable? I would absolutley love to work on the article but I don't want to dive in to it and put the time in if I knew that eventually the article would be deleted and my work made obsolete. Cheers. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 07:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017 edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jussi Jääskeläinen. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Mattythewhite Jussi Jääskeläinen has signed to atletico de kolkata four days ago and the source now added to the article Akhiljaxxn (talk) 15:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

About West Block Blues edit

Hi Akhiljaxxn,
I have declined the speedy deletion of that article manually (the script wasn't recognising your speedy deletion tag). The reasons included in the edit summary is: It gets enough coverage to avoid WP:A7 and/or be a plausible redirect to Bengaluru FC. If you think it doesn't pass WP:GNG, feel free to take it to WP:AFD.
Please let me know if you have any questions. --Shirt58 (talk) 03:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rahul Kannoly Praveen edit

 

The article Rahul Kannoly Praveen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON. fails subject specific guidelines, specifically WP:NFOOTBALL. Coverage is WP:ROUTINE and per WP:ANYBIO does not indicate he has made widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record of football

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ClubOranjeT 00:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dheeraj Singh Moirangthem edit

 

The article Dheeraj Singh Moirangthem has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ClubOranjeT 00:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dheeraj Singh Moirangthem for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dheeraj Singh Moirangthem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dheeraj Singh Moirangthem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Inter&anthro (talk) 04:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Recent page creations of India U17 players. edit

Hi. I think it might be best if you wait with creating any more pages on India U17 football players until the outcome of the current AFD discussions as noted above. If the result of that discussion is delete it will surely be the same for the others, which would not be a productive use of any ones time - including yours - if we have to put the also through separate discussions. If the result is keep, then you could carry on creating others. Thanks. ClubOranjeT 12:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

User_talk:ClubOranje Ok thanks. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 14:06, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jeakson Singh Thounaojam edit

 

The article Jeakson Singh Thounaojam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 14:26, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Again? edit

How many times have I linked you WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG? --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 14:26, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

User:ArsenalFan700 i think this is first time.. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 15:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones edit

It seems like you are again disrupting the articles depending on your personal analysis. The recent edits you made on List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones, by changing the list and not providing the reliable sources or starting discussion before making controversial edit can lead to topic ban. Excelse (talk) 08:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

User:Excelse i've submitted enough relaible sources from billboard to prove my claims.The washigton post article that you gave me is too old and billboard changed its rules since then. pls get your fact right.Akhiljaxxn (talk) 08:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
That has to be supported by source not by your personal opinion. And your billboard source doesn't mentions your personal analysis anywhere. Not even a sentence to support the nonsense you are blabbering. You can't just go on changing every article to suit your POV. Stop your edit warring now. what kind of disruption is this[1]? Edit summary reads like a parody of my edit summary on other article[2] because there is no "earlier version" but recent disruption from you that has to be reverted since your edits are baseless. Excelse (talk) 09:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
What do you say about these [[1]][[2]][[3]][[4]]sources by billboard ? Billboard says elvis has 17 number one on their chart and announced mariah carey has 18 number one single in the United States, more than any other solo artist.This not my opinion but Billboard itself.pls read these sources by billboard and be up to dated with chartnews.wikipedia not the place for your elvis pushing .Thank you Akhiljaxxn (talk) 10:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Don't allege me of POV pushing when you are very alone with your disruptive WP:OR. Your edit warring is making me bring this to ANI, given your long term disruption on music-related articles. I have replied the rest on article's talk page. Excelse (talk) 05:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

Nomination of Jeakson Singh Thounaojam for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeakson Singh Thounaojam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeakson Singh Thounaojam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 15:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

your edit in Actor Vijay page doesnt seem valid edit

Hi there I just saw you are trying to revert the vijay page to a very old version. The page is restored back and it is all clearly explained as per authentic sources. If you want to make any changes to the page make sure you provide authentic sources if its puffery. Thank you :) Bothiman — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.207.185.81 (talk) 16:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why are removing his autograph, doctorate and reverting it to a very old version what's wrong with you. if you want to make changes try to make it as per sourced content thank you (User talk:Bothiman) —Preceding undated comment added 16:47, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

it will be removed soon by other users coz its full of pov fancruft.wikioedia is an encyclopedia not an fan page of vijay.Akhiljaxxn (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

I feel there is no fancruft is autograph and getting doctorate fancruft???. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.207.185.81 (talk) 17:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Removal of translation edit

Hi there, re: this edit, you removed a translation of Thalapathy. Surely you would want to communicate to our English readership what this word means, right? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:42, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

oh i'm sorry i didnt noticed that. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 00:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Akhiljaxxn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Taylor edit

You could have just linked the goal.com article. I needed a source that Baker was the one replaced... reliable one. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 16:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArsenalFan700 anyway u got it.Akhiljaxxn (talk) 16:07, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
No, exactly haha. Just wanted to let you know for the future. Thanks :) --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 16:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Eminem album sales edit

Hi, could you please provide sources showing that the total certified copies of TMM LPt is 15.1M? Sources for 20.1 million come from muscal certifications bodies of the different countries. Sumo ch (talk) 12:55, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hope you got the answer here Talk:List of best-selling albums. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 01:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Pending changes reviewer granted edit

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 14:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ajith Sivan edit

 

The article Ajith Sivan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArsenalFan700 (talk) 17:06, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammad Rashid (footballer) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mohammad Rashid (footballer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Waddie96 (talk) 07:35, 26 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Jake Brockman have declined the speedy deletion of that article manually . The reasons included in the edit summary is: footballer in national first division club is claim of significance.If you think it doesn't pass WP:GNG, feel free to take it to WP:AFD.
Please let me know if you have any questions. --Akhiljaxxn (talk) 03:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

I noticed that you tagged the page Segregation and Integration for speedy deletion with the reason "Not a Dictionary". However, "Not a Dictionary" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can propose the page for deletion if it appears to be an uncontroversial matter, or take the page to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for discussion on the merits if you still seek deletion. Thanks! IffyChat -- 11:04, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Onam 2018 edit

  Onam 2018
Onam 2018 Why Bro Princapanakkal (talk) 11:52, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Haii Bro edit

How ARe You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Princapanakkal (talkcontribs) 14:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at John Johnson (footballer). Mattythewhite (talk) 21:05, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mattythewhite atk completed their two year contract with john johnson two weeks ago and here is the [[3]].he may play two more games for bengaluru fc.-Akhiljaxxn (talk) 10:36, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
Thanks but it needs to be cited in the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:58, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
I thought i cited it there... -Akhiljaxxn (talk) 05:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, Brian Plummer (Football Player) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Brian Plummer (Football Player). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Brian Plummer (American football). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Brian Plummer (American football). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. KingAndGod 07:36, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

user:KingAndGod :hey it happened accidently due to the conflict of edits ,hope someone would delete that article very soon.-Akhiljaxxn (talk) 08:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain edit

  Hi Akhiljaxxn. We appreciate your enthusiasm but please refrain from tagging articles for now – some maintenance tasks are not suitable for beginners. New Page Review requires significant experience, which you don't have yet. However, if you have already made at least 200 mainspace edits, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn about keeping pages free of nonsense. Consider doing recent changes patrol for vandalism instead. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Happy editing! ~ Winged BladesGodric 13:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hey i'm not a new user.I've been editing wikipedia since 2014 and i'm currently a pc reviewer on english wiki and an admin of malayalam wikipedia.I've read NPR thoroughly and I'm well aware of this.I'm sorry for my hurry burry but i find most of my taggings were right.thank you-Akhiljaxxn (talk) 04:13, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Rollback granted edit

 

Hi Akhiljaxxn. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Nakon 03:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

New page reviewer granted edit

 

Hello Akhiljaxxn. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia; if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Swarm 07:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Added more sources edit

I have added more sources to Five Core Electronics Limited as per your recommendation, is it ok now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yourmanmohan (talkcontribs) 07:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

I have unreviewed a page you curated edit

Thanks for reviewing Deep Vihar, Akhiljaxxn.

Unfortunately Usernamekiran has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Hi. The article is about a colony within a city. While WP:GEOLAND is applicable to the city, it is not applicable to the internal regions. General notability criteria is applicable to such areas.

To reply, leave a comment on Usernamekiran's talk page.

usernamekiran(talk) 18:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

RE:I have unreviewed a page you curated edit

That's perfectly fine by me. Thanks for doing that! ToThAc (talk) 16:36, 3 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

I have unreviewed a page you curated edit

Hi, I'm John from Idegon. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Janice Danielle, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

John from Idegon (talk) 06:56, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Kerala Blasters edit

Please read what I wrote on the edit summary for Kerala Blasters before reverting again. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 07:59, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

K.M.Noordeen edit

Hello Akhilj I came to know that you have submitted a speedy deletion notification for K.M.Noordeen. I have to still work in the article to correct text as well as citations to be created. Please do not tagg for deletion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

Speedy deletion declined: Tzvi Hirsch Braude edit

Hello Akhiljaxxn, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tzvi Hirsch Braude, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: notable parent indicates significance. WP:ATD counsels merging if non-notable on his own. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 13:21, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: Ninu Galot edit

Hello Akhiljaxxn. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ninu Galot, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. SoWhy 13:22, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mohammad-Ali Ala al-Saltaneh edit

Hi , this source Persian language , you can translator Kurdistantolive (talk) 14:11, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

I added english source for this article, help me Kurdistantolive (talk) 14:22, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Kurdistantolive Hi, how can i help you?. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 14:34, 11 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi , I want to get this tool Pending changes reviewer . If you can help me for that
Kurdistantolive (talk) 21:32, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Kurdistantolive Oh sorry i have no permission for that; You are free to apply here.Akhiljaxxn (talk) 17:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined edit

with respect to Carl Myers, "Principal of the Royal Ballet" is a very clear indication of at least signifcance--and probably actual notability also. It does need referencing. Please think more carefully before listing for speedy deletion. DGG ( talk ) 17:18, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Full citations edit

Dear Akhil, please make an effort add full citations when you add content. Author, title, publisher and date are essential fields of the citations. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:31, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok, Sure.Akhiljaxxn (talk) 17:53, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

I have unreviewed a page you curated edit

Hi, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, P. Indra Reddy, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Onel5969 TT me 19:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive edit

Hello TheWikiholic, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

  • As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
  • Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar:  . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards:  ,  ,  ,  .
  • Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mina Sadati edit

Hi , can you see Mina Sadati
Kurdistantolive (talk) 04:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)Reply


recent reviews edit

Among articles you have reviewed in the last few days, I have nominated for deletion

Kerala Travels Interserve via speedy as A7 and G11
Do Women Have A Higher Sex Drive? via prod as no third party reliable sources for notability 0
Fynd vvia AfD--se the reasons at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fynd

I am conerned that you are making too many misjudgments at New Page Patrol, as noticed by other editors also-. Perhaps you should stop marking as patrolled for a while until you get a better sense of what is acceptable --one way to to watch discussions at AfD. DGG ( talk ) 04:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

DGG Hey I'm sorry for your concern. It's been only a few days now since I used to review new pages and when I place different tags in different new pages using page curation tool it automatically marks as patrolled and sometimes I forget to un review these pages. This is why it happens and I promise I will be more careful in this regard in coming days. Thanks.Akhiljaxxn (talk) 16:23, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Mina Sadati article edit

Hi , please help for this article, help me for this article to stay in Wikipedia , they want to remove this article .She is a famous acteer in Iran, please help me, best regards Kurdistantolive (talk) 09:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: Richie (Outasight album) edit

Hello Akhiljaxxn. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Richie (Outasight album), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: artist has an article. Thank you. SoWhy 07:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply