TheWikiManRules

WP:GS/SCW&ISIL notice

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Citations

Thanks for the edit you made to the article on Hasan ibn Ali.[1] Please could you cover the URL, when you make citations.

Covering the URL has many advantages:

• URLs sometimes change. If we know what the URL was for, we can find the new URL for the source.
• It also tells people what the source is.

Since you know how to do a citation, I assume that you know how to cover a URL.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Hasan ibn Ali edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hasan ibn Ali. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saudi uprising (1979–present)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Saudi uprising (1979–present) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 18:25, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

So that you have time to develop an article, I have moved the page to the Draft namespace, you can find it at Draft:Saudi uprising (1979–present). - GB fan 18:32, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

I have deleted Saudi uprising (1979–present) and Draft:Saudi uprising (1979–present) because you copied and pasted the content from http://www.aei.org/publication/saudi-arabias-forgotten-shiite-spring/ Write the article in your own words, do not copy and paste from sources. - GB fan 20:38, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Hello, I'm Emir of Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently removed content from Shia view of the Quran without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:30, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Saudi uprising (1979–present)

Hello, TheWikiManRules. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Saudi uprising".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:41, 25 August 2017 (UTC)