Welcome! edit

Hello, ThePacificMan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 11:35, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

ThePacificMan, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi ThePacificMan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, ThePacificMan. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Usedtobecool ✉️  18:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Kingsteps has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kingsteps. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingsteps has been accepted edit

 
Kingsteps, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to wikiproject tropical cyclones! edit

 

Hi, and welcome to the Tropical cyclone WikiProject! We are a group of Wikipedia editors who help to improve articles related to tropical cyclones on Wikipedia.

Looking for somewhere to start? Here are a few suggestions.

If you have any comments, suggestions, or would like to talk about the project in general, feel free to leave a message on the talk page.

$$ This is a message sent by DavidTheMeteorologist🌦❄️🌪

AfC notification: Draft:Caroline Islands Air has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Caroline Islands Air. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:14, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Caroline Islands Air has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Caroline Islands Air. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:11, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Caroline Islands Air has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Caroline Islands Air. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:13, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caroline Islands Air (August 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Whispering(t) 15:30, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

To submit an article for review you need to click the blue "submit" button but not until you have found at least three solid reliable independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 15:45, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caroline Islands Air (August 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 15:46, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Which part of this message did you fail to understand? --David Biddulph (talk) 18:47, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caroline Islands Air (August 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 08:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kieran Corr edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kieran Corr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Railfan23 (talk) 10:40, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Pembroke Aircraft Leasing 4 Ltd edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pembroke Aircraft Leasing 4 Ltd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Railfan23 (talk) 10:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Caroline Islands Air (August 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 15:09, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2019 edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock pupppetry with Hurricanesicks (talk · contribs), as   Confirmed by checkuser. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:29, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThePacificMan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I never created that account and have nothing to do with it.

Decline reason:

So you're saying it's entirely a coincidence that that other editor who happens to share your interests also happens to share your technical information? Sorry, I don't believe that. Huon (talk) 17:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ThePacificMan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Who was the one who reverted those vandalism edits. They are from the uk whareas I'm from Majuro. Doesnt like aviation like me I don't think. ThePacificMan (talk) 17:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Overlap in edits, same IP address, same browser, same computer. Block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 18:53, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fucking forget it then by Wikipedia go fuck yourself. ThePacificMan (talk) 19:18, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Block made indefinite because you're probably Fly High in the Sky (talk · contribs). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:20, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Well I'm not you fucking spy. ThePacificMan (talk) 19:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Caroline Islands Air concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Caroline Islands Air, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Caroline Islands Air edit

 

Hello, ThePacificMan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Caroline Islands Air".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 11:00, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply