Tetrapak3

Welcome

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've repeatedly removed the hatnote from the King (band) article. The hatnote is there to help users find articles, and this one should remain in place. Do you see a problem with the way it is worded? Please let me know if there's something I can do to help improve the article. Thank you! - Eureka Lott 14:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Ah, now I understand what you hoped to accomplish. I'm afraid there isn't a good answer, though. The only way to have the KING (band) article appear first in a search would be to move the King (band) article, and I don't think that would be a good idea. I think the current setup, with the hatnote at King (band), will have to do. - Eureka Lott 19:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

You may want to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policy for article titles and the guideline covering band names. Please remember that article titles must uphold Wikipedia's neutral point of view and should reflect a long-term view. If you think you can convince the Wikipedia community that the page should be renamed, you can list it at Wikipedia:Requested moves. - Eureka Lott 19:29, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lucius (entertainer)

Hello Tetrapak3,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lucius (entertainer) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, "Pepper" @ 11:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruby (entertainer)

Hello Tetrapak3,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ruby (entertainer) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, "Pepper" @ 11:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jazzy (entertainer)

Hello Tetrapak3,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jazzy (entertainer) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, "Pepper" @ 11:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Queenie (entertainer)

Hello Tetrapak3,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Queenie (entertainer) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, "Pepper" @ 11:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trillion (entertainer)

Hello Tetrapak3,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Trillion (entertainer) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, "Pepper" @ 11:32, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

"Entertainer" articles

Hey - please don't create empty articles, even if you do have the intention of writing them some time in the future. If you would like a place to practice writing the articles before you submit them, you can create a userspace draft. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note here. "Pepper" @ 11:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Seconded. You cannot simply create placeholders for articles with no content; they will be removed. Please create such pages in your sandbox or in a userspace draft. When you have created something that can stand as an encyclopedic article, let me or another editor know and we'll be happy to help move it into mainspace. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:55, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to KING (band), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:19, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

• Please stop adding unsourced information about living persons to articles. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia requirements for verifiability and sourcing. older ≠ wiser 13:46, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited KING (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malibu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:22, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Problems with your editing

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to edit Wikipedia disruptively, you may be blocked from editing. Amongst other problems with your editing are the following. You have repeatedly removed "citation needed" tags without providing citations. You have repeatedly added promotional claims without providing sources. You have added content with supposed "references" which do not support the claims you have made. You have been edit warring, that is to say repeatedly reverting to the same, or partly the same, content, over and over again when others have undone your edits. Edit warring is disruptive: if you think there are valid reasons to support your version of an article when it is disputed by another editor, then please explain your reasons, be ready to discuss the issues, and try to reach consensus. Simply repeatedly trying to push your preferred version through is not acceptable. Do not edit war even if you are convinced that you are "right". Also please note that Wikipedia content must be supported by reliable sources that can be verified by other editors. An anonymous person who chooses to create a Wikipedia account and then says "you can take my word for it, because I know" is not a verifiable reliable source. 79.123.83.147 (talk) 15:57, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

KING (band) 79.123.83.147 (talk) 15:57, 14 March 2013 (UTC)