TerryFried

hi ...

No point leaving messages here cos I don't intend returning to read them! Some of you guys need a sense of humour transplant! You're so weighed down by Wiki rules you've lost your humanity ...

Leaving one anyway...

Having to figure out whether or not your socks are really socks has caused me to read deeper into your situation. In many ways, I sympathize. I have trouble with Smatprt, too. My way of dealing with him is mainly to avoid authorship articles as much as I can. (I'm not really interested in them anyway) You, however, don't have that option as much as I do. I feel that there has been a lot of overreaction going around. I'm not going to tell you what to do. I will tell you, though, that I won't sound the warning horn on wikipedia if you come back and are planning on following the rules. If you have trouble with Smatprt, the only consolation I can give is that he will be and has been blocked whenever evidence was shown that he broke policy, just like anyone else on wikipedia. Also, the more people you can get interested in editing authorship articles on wikipedia, the less likely it is that it will boil down into a one-on-one fight. I think you've got a lot to offer and your leaving wikipedia is just as sad as if any other editor were to leave. Wrad (talk) 19:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

I hope you're looking for a truce and not vengeance, personally. Wrad (talk) 20:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Smashville^talk 22:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps you shouldn't bring attention to your indef block, your sockpuppetry case and then start signing your posts as "Barry". --Smashville^talk 22:08, 1 January 2009 (UTC)