User talk:TechnoSquirrel69/Archive 1

Latest comment: 8 months ago by TechnoSquirrel69 in topic Profanity in Wikipedia articles
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 5

A belated welcome!

 
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, TechnoSquirrel69! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Mai-Portrait.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Mai-Portrait.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Essenger-Portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Essenger-Portrait.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:30, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:Essenger-Portrait.jpg

 

The page File:Essenger-Portrait.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://genius.com/artists/Essenger. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — JJMC89(T·C) 09:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:Mai-Portrait.jpg

 

The page File:Mai-Portrait.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appeared to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.usajapan.org/annual-gala-main-2/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — JJMC89(T·C) 09:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Profanity in Wikipedia articles

Hello TechnoSquirrel69, you recently censored an instance of the f-word in the article on Nightcore citing a opinion essay about profanity as your reasoning for the change. As the essay states in its first sentence, it does not dispute the policy that Wikipedia is not censored. I somewhat vaguely mentioned this policy in my edit uncensoring the f-word. Additionally, the essay you referenced only suggests avoiding the use of profanity on discussion pages, such as this one. Overall, in order to clearly and accurately communicate the information of the Nightcore article, I think the f-word should be presented as it was in the source, uncensored. Please let me know your thoughts and take care. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 05:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mai Fujisawa (February 19)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 19:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 
Hello, TechnoSquirrel69! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 19:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating the non-free content policy, as you did at Draft:Mirror (Porter Robinson song).
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — JJMC89(T·C) 06:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mirror (Porter Robinson song) has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mirror (Porter Robinson song). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Request for unblock

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TechnoSquirrel69 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

To whom it may concern, I would like to request that my account be unblocked. I understand that I have been flagged for copyright violations for my use of an image on Draft:Mirror (Porter Robinson song). For that I would like to apologize. I have since read through Wikipedia's copyright policies and can assure you that I will not make the mistake again.

However, I am slightly confused, because I believe the block is in relation to two other images which I uploaded (that have since been taken down) that violated the copyright policies, and not the one on Draft:Mirror (Porter Robinson song). To my knowledge, I followed all the steps required for declaring the copyrights of an album/single cover. Would you mind informing me if I need to do anything else to correctly upload the image? Thanks in advance! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Declining per JJMC89's comment below. signed, Rosguill talk 15:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks, Rosguill! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:09, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey Rosguill, it looks like JJMC89 isn't going to respond. I've looked on their page for any other way to connect with them, but there's no email or anything listed, and as you know, I can't edit their talk page. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Rosguill didn't actually ping me. I am not inclined to unblock since your request states that you don't understand why you were blocked. You were blocked for repeatedly violating the non-free content policy by using non-free media (File:Porter-Robinson-Mirror.jpg) in a draft (Draft:Mirror (Porter Robinson song)). The other two images that you uploaded are copyright violations, but were not related to your block. — JJMC89(T·C) 05:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
JJMC89, I now realize what the issue was, and I was not aware until now that images of that kind could not be used in a draft article, as that point is not mentioned specifically in the non-free content policy. Also, I just checked the editing history of the article and realized that I reverted your deletion of the image several times, and I would just like to clarify why I did that. At the time, I was not looking at the editing history and assumed that there had been some mistake while saving the draft or that I had accidentally deleted the image while I was editing the article, not that it had been manually taken down several times. My apologies for that, I did not re-upload the image that many times with the intention of making repeated copyright infringements. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 11:12, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
JJMC89, apologies for the repeated pings, but I would like to know if you would be willing to reconsider my appeal for unblock, or whether it would be in order for me to submit another request. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 10:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
The location restriction is criterion 9. It is also mentioned at Wikipedia:Drafts#Preparing drafts. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
I understand why I was banned, JJMC89, and it won't happen again. Would you be willing to reconsider this appeal, or would it be alright if I submitted another one? —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 10:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

TechnoSquirrel69 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

As per the messages above, I have discussed with the administrator who blocked me and clarified with them the reason for the decision. I now understand why I was blocked and will not make the mistake again. And so, I would like to request again for my account to unblocked. Thanks! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 09:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Accept reason:

You have explained that you understand the policy about non-free content and will adhere to it. Please do so.

Thanks for reinstating my account, anonymous administrator, and thanks to Rosguill and JJMC89 for the clarifications. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mirror (Porter Robinson song) has been accepted

 
Mirror (Porter Robinson song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 08:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Notifying of reply at User talk:Sean Stephens

 
Hello, TechnoSquirrel69. You have new messages at Sean Stephens's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sean Stephens (talk) 01:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unfold (Porter Robinson song) has been accepted

 
Unfold (Porter Robinson song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mai Fujisawa

  Hello, TechnoSquirrel69. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mai Fujisawa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

October 2022

  Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to 2022 Morbi bridge collapse. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Same goes for spelling of "metre", etc. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)