August 2015 edit

  Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Nigel de Jong does not have an edit summary. Then PLEASE explain your edits with an edit summary

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:59, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Arjen Robben does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Indefinite block edit

Hello TeaLover, please remember you are being watched by a lot of people now and if you return to your usual bad editing, I will request you are blocked indefinitely to stop you editing the encyclopaedia. JMHamo (talk) 22:51, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

@JMHamo: Yes friend, I understand, I am aiming to become a good editor like others including you. Happy editing   TeaLover1996 (talk) 22:58, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, TeaLover1996. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk) 00:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, TeaLover1996. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Chamith (talk) 03:53, 29 August 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

ANI notification edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 21:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Clean start criteria edit

You are claiming to be making a clean start, but you need to read Wikipedia:Clean start#Criteria. --David Biddulph (talk) 23:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

Here, you're reverting to a wrong information again. Apparently, all the warnings were in vain, so I've blocked you indefinitely. Admins: while I'm usually fine with any my admin action being undone for whatever reason without even consulting with me, this user has a long history of various problems, so please don't unblock without a community consensus. Max Semenik (talk) 23:29, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

September 2015 edit

  Hello, TeaLover1996, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • So much for "I wanna be an admin" plans. Seriously, now that you're blocked you're aiming for WP:LTA? Max Semenik (talk) 18:52, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:HTML Example Code.png edit

 

The file File:HTML Example Code.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)Reply