Tdc42
Welcome Tdc42!
I'm Rasnaboy, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Naghadeh edit
I am from iran naghadeh why did you remove the second name naghadeh is also known and famous for ویانا فاضلی Siamak202020 (talk) 15:52, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- @Siamak202020 I reverted your edits to Naqadeh because they were not constructive. You added an invalid parameter to the infobox, you changed the native name to ویانا فاضلی which appears to be a person's name, and your statement "Naghadeh has a princess and her name is Viyana Fazeli" did not have a source. Please see our policies on verifiability and our guide to using infoboxes. Also, in case you weren't aware, we do have a Persian Wikipedia. Tdc42 (talk) 20:02, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
When Aliens Attack edit
Hello Tdc42. Thanks for the comment. I did not add a source for the recent revision because the source was cited correctly, just the content published was incorrect. Please check the first source https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0756892/ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=When_Aliens_Attack&oldid=937430241 — Preceding unsigned comment added by NorikDavtian (talk • contribs) 02:37, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Regarding Guru Arjan Dev Ji images edit
Dear Sir, i went to Guru Arjan Dev Ji page. I saw your Guru Arjan Dev ji page image. Which is not Guru Arjan Dev ji. that is Mughal emperor . Please remove it. I will send to you Guru Arjan Dev Ji picture link please use https://www.askideas.com/guru-arjan-dev-ji-martyrdom-day/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sikhveer (talk • contribs) 06:49, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Your edit to Bill Stoltze edit
Seeing as how you used Twinkle, which is often used in lieu of any actual human judgement, I'm wondering if you read the text you restored and whether it passes BLP muster. I haven't had the time lately to initiate any discussions on the matter. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 03:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
- @RadioKAOS: I looked briefly at it but I haven't considered it too thoroughly. It cites sources I consider reliable, but it does appear to be unbalanced with too much material about the scandal, and is kind of confusing and hard to follow at any rate. I wouldn't fight to keep most of that material up, but the edit I reverted went overboard IMO. Tdc42 (talk) 03:59, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Regarding wrong information about Guru Tegh Bahadur in Execution by Aurangzeb topic in Guru Tegh Bahadur Article edit
Dear Sir,
I read your article about Guru Tegh Bahadur. In which Execution by Aurangzeb topic provide totally wrong information about sikh Guru sahib. see topic According to the official account of the Mughal Empire, written 107 years later by Ghulam Husain of Lucknow in 1782,[35][36]
Tegh Bahadur, the eighth successor of (Guru) Nanak
as we know he is ninth Sikh Guru.
adopting a habit of coercion and extortion.
He is Sikh guru. who helped people not extortion. He saved life of Kashmiri pandit. not extorted.
we request to you please deleted this wrong information in Guru Tegh Bahadur Article. we thankful to you--Sikhveer (talk) 04:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Sikhveer: I reverted your edit because it removed a sourced quotation without proper justification. The quotation is based on records of the Mughal Empire, and this fact is put into context by the rest of the section. Removing the quotation renders the rest of the section nonsensical. If you take issue with the way the section is written, I suggest taking it to the article's talk page to try to reach a consensus with editors. Also, the quotation does not conflict with your observation that he was the ninth Sikh Guru. The quotation is that Guru Tegh Bahadur was the eighth successor to Guru Nanak, not the eighth Sikh Guru. Guru Nanak was the first, and Guru Tegh Bahadur being the eighth successor makes him the ninth Sikh Guru. Tdc42 (talk) 03:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Tamara Arciuch’s photo edit
I’m Tamara’s husband. For a few years Wikipedia shows this image of my wife, which is a very poor one. Tamara protests to use this photo, that has been taken after the heavy play in theatre, she’s agreed to take some private photo and would NEVER LET THIS PHOTO GO PUBLIC. Please remove this photo, we can send You a lot if better and more up to date photos. Bartlomiej Kasprzykowski Bkasprzykowski (talk) 20:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Bkasprzykowski: If you can provide a better photo that meets our image use policy then by all means, please upload it. But since you have a direct connection to the article's subject, I would also strongly advise you to read our guide to editing with a conflict of interest to avoid potential future edit disputes. Tdc42 (talk) 01:43, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Cordial greetings edit
Thank you Tdc42, for explaining the change you have made, no problem, I still need to learn certain things. Nice to greet you.
Please quit vandalizing the PHS page edit
The colors are red and gold, and that was officially announced at the PHS board meeting on February 14, 2020. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Postboards (talk • contribs) 01:49, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Postboards: You need to provide a source for that. And don't accuse me of vandalism when you're making edits like this one and this one. Tdc42 (talk) 02:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello, Tdc42 do you what the religion and WikiProject Islam is about?74.67.178.97 (talk) 13:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)