License tagging for Image:Buswell.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Buswell.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomas Howard (writer and scholar) edit

 

The article Thomas Howard (writer and scholar) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is not apparent from the article. The only source is the subject's web page. Claiming relationship with better-known family members inspires no confidence in the inherent notability of the subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David_FLXD (Talk) 20:44, 19 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Thomas Howard (writer and scholar) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Howard (writer and scholar) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Howard (writer and scholar) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. 84user (talk) 15:19, 25 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

ANI discussion edit

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 00:30, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries edit

Do not leave summaries like "undoing vandalism by troll". It is a personal attack against the editor (see WP:NPA) and is simply rude. It doesn't help anyone, nor is it conducive to a collegiate environment. It can also get you blocked if you do it regularly. We are here to work together, so comment on the merits of the edit, not your opinion of the editor. I'm not inclined to repeat warnings for stuff like this, so you might consider it a last warning. Thanks. Dennis Brown - © Join WER 01:32, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Robert Morris Grant edit

 

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Robert Morris Grant, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Robert McQueen Grant. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 08:45, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

I think the bot got confused. I've removed the tag, so you have nothing further to worry about—but I didn't want to delete this message myself. (Feel free to after you read it, of course.) —C.Fred (talk) 13:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
The bot wasn't confused. If you want to move a page to a new title, please use the move tool instead of copying and pasting the content. I have transferred the article you wrote to Robert M. Grant (theologian). Hut 8.5 19:46, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply