March 2009 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Schenck v. United States has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Versus22 talk 22:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Texas v. Johnson. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Versus22 talk 22:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Everson v. Board of Education. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Versus22 talk 22:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Engel v. Vitale. Versus22 talk 23:00, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


 
As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page. Kuru talk 23:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply