Sven nestle2
June 2011 edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Art of Computer Programming, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Art of Computer Programming was changed by Sven nestle2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908325 on 2011-06-06T18:53:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:53, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sorting algorithm. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Glrx (talk) 21:34, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Please stop adding your material to sorting algorithm until you have a consensus for it on the talk page. Glrx (talk) 15:58, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Sort in random edit
$ echo "Wikibooks Wikipedia Wiktionary" | sort --random-sort Wikipedia Wikibooks Wiktionary
new development of Sort edit
Sort uses merge sorting and is speedy to complete 1 column sorting (in a table of rows and colums of words to be selected and sorted).
There is a new sort(1), headsort(1), using an algorthim with opposite speed properties of merge sort that when sorting more than one column can finish in 1/2 the time, or when only needing to begin streaming the sorted data can finish in 1/2 the time (thus head). Both is often yet faster as sort(1) is terrible at many columns and piping. Simply put: headsort(1) is a better choice than sort(1) if columns and or piping is expected on random data and speed is needed.
If you are interested in headsort(1) "1/2 the time" contact johnandsara2@cox.net or sven_nestle2 on wiki with subject "sort algorithm".
heasort(1) is an un-licensed but finished C unix binary with manpage. this is so I can get school or work credit for submission, sorry.
You can leave messages below but the email will be far faster in response.
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:52, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Redirected article edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for creating the article, Longitude and Latitude. However, there already is an article on that topic, geographic coordinate system, so your article was redirected to the existing one. Please take advantage of the search feature to find similar-named articles before creating them in the future—and feel free to redirect alternate spellings of existing articles. Thanks. Kolbasz (talk) 20:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jurisdiction Shauna Hadden edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jurisdiction Shauna Hadden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 23:41, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Shauna Hadden and Jurisdiction edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shauna Hadden and Jurisdiction requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ...William 23:59, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
The article Truth in crime statistics 2013 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Implausible article; current article contains original research, and its coverage is routine crime reporting.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 00:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Please review a few Wikipedia policies, like reliable sourcing, verifiability, and please remember that Wikipedia isn't a soapbox for your views on topics and is not a free webhost for speculation. Acroterion (talk) 01:34, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Truth in crime statistics 2013 edit
A tag has been placed on Truth in crime statistics 2013, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
July 2013 edit
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Truth in crime statistics 2013, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 16:02, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
The article Ancient Laws of Greece has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Ancient Laws of Greece. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. TOW talk 22:32, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Ancient Laws of Greece for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ancient Laws of Greece is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ancient Laws of Greece until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:35, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Ancient Laws of Greece. TOW talk 22:38, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|your reason here}} below. ... discospinster talk 22:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 
Sven nestle2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The blocker is vandalizing my own private material that Im still working on (not removing it from another page, which i don't like but don't complain about either). I'm writing a positive article and believe I can cite every idea as being derived from collegiate sources. The Vandalizer did not use the Talk section. The Vandalizer IP blocked me which is against the telephone company agreement to do to another online user. I was not writing the artcle 5 minutes - 5 minutes until IP bocked. It is harassment. The competing article cites Homer which Im sure is simply intellectual fiction and way outdated based on newer archeological finds and text. And Homer wasnt a lawyer in Ancient Greece much the opposite: a fiction writer. It is normal to have an "imperfect" article when starting one: there's plenty of real junk on wikipedia and plenty of politics and lies. Please stop harassing me for doing: good work - if you don't beleive me let's debate the facts by email. Again: citing Homer as a legal reference is simply poor cut and paste work by today's updated knowlege. Wikipedia really needs to do more about vandalizers that delete other's articles - i really could care less about their opinion if they don't like my work they can write their own page or dispute who owns the page title. Thank you very much.
Decline reason:
There is no such thing as "your own private article" on Wikipedia. --jpgordon::==( o ) 00:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your contributed article, Longitude and Lattitude edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Longitude and Lattitude. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Longitude. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Longitude – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. reddogsix (talk) 04:00, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Head sort has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Original research, personal essay. See temporary addition to Sorting algorithm at [1] and discussion at Talk:Sorting_algorithm#Perfect_Sort_.2F_Triangulation_Sort.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 05:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bezier example edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bezier example requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 05:46, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 6 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Head sort (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Robert Sedgewick
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Your recent edits edit
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Your contributed article, Longitude and Lattitude Brief edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Longitude and Lattitude Brief. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Longitude. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Longitude – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Lugia2453 (talk) 22:47, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Problem theory for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Problem theory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Problem theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kolbasz (talk) 10:23, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Longitude and Lattitude Summary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Longitude and Lattitude Brief returns under yet another name. See also Talk:Longitude#Longitude_and_Latitude_Brief and User:Sven_nestle2
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Bezier example has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fragment dumped out of nowhere. Please see editor's other contributions too
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
ANI edit
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Longitude and Lattitude Brief refuses to die. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:45, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Head sort has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- WP:OR personal essay by an editor with a problematic track record of such things.
Sorting is a massively studied topic and, like free energy, it is easy for basement geniuses to invent new forms of it. However this is why we require independent sourcing, which this article does not have.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:02, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Head sort is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Head sort until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Psychonaut (talk) 12:03, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Cats edit
_by_Ron.jpg)
Hi. I just wanted to stop by and say hello.